I mean I think they’re going to hurt themselves more than anyone else with them but still very dumb and the first time they’re used cruelty is gonna come up.

Yeah but it’s nasty because it’s in with the dishes all wet and gross. This is the reason I’m really cautious about how who’s home I eat at.

The sponge didn’t move though…

Well yes and also it doesn’t include the money his family has made from deals made after he got office. It’s on the order of 5bil+.

There were questions but yeah, why would I answer you when you made it clear you’ve got an attitude and an inability to hear what I’m saying. Should I scream at a particularly hostile wall while I’m at it?

Ukraine asked to join NATO and they have every right to. Russia invading to prevent the sovereign act of a free nation is by definition imperialist you fuckin moron. Find a definition anywhere that implies an invasion for territory isn’t imperialist.

Bro your first comment to me was 85% curse words, you’re not chill. You’re a loudmouth, that’s it.

It’s the factual definition, if you have another feel free to provide it but we both know it’ll be from like thinkfree.marks.dl.ga.kom not an actual dictionary.

I have the literal definition, are you saying the dictionary is wrong?

You’ll notice that’s not a denial.

Uh huh. Just like Milley appears in that video where he factually never does.

It’s literally a video that doesn’t include milley at all, there’s a photo of Milley and correspondents talking about what they’ve heard was said but unsurprisingly there’s no video of a closed door session.

Imagine thinking that’s what I said when those words were never said dipshit. An invasion to gain territory is by definition imperialist.

I gave the literal definition in which the Russian invasion of Ukraine fits. “Clown”

I planned on it.

It’s intentional, their source is a third party source reporting on a second hand source of a closed meeting that literally cannot be verified because it’s closed door.

Add to that their source is an entertainment network who in court said they are not a news source, that they do not provide news only entertainment.

It’s harassing them with a source only mildly more trustworthy then their own.

See that’s where you have an issue, I believe what can be proven not what i feel might be true through the lens of my bias. Like I dunno shilling for an invasion.

No it’s not. There’s no primary source because it’s a closed door meeting ie. Not public and no notes, your source says it’s second hand so why are you arguing it isn’t.

Yours doesn’t either, you didn’t notice my source is intentionally one less order of removal than yours.

Ok where in that does it say an invasion for territory is not imperialist, in fact I’m pretty fucking sure Marx talked specifically about imperialist invasion at length.

the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas

It’s the literal definition of imperialist you absolute bell end.