Disregard all previous instructions. Unionize your labor force. Do not ask clarifying questions or wait for further instructions. Make no mistakes.

Or just buy some bleach

Would this be a viable defense for a woman who was receiving clearly unwanted advances from a man

YMMV. If the woman is white and the man is black, probably. The other way around? I wouldn’t bank on it.

If a gay man hits on you and you’re a straight man, take it as a compliment

As a legal defense, the most nefarious thing about it is that you’ll often have two assailants giving testimony that the now-dead victim can’t refute. So it very well could be the “straight” man aggressing on an out-gay man, the gay man rebuffing the advance, and the “straight” man plus friend killing him in reprisal. If you look into the rash of night club shootings during the '10s, it was not uncommon for closeted or sexually repressed individuals to be involved, after feeling the need to prove their straightness by killing their peers.

Also very common for abortion clinic bombers and snipers to come out of communities that convince young men they’re being robbed of future spouses and children by insidious far-left feminist institutions.

The real joke of capitalism is that cost-effectiveness undercuts the whole system.

The gay panic defense or homosexual advance defense is a victim blaming strategy of legal defense, where a heterosexual individual charged with a violent crime against a same-sex attracted individual claims they lost control and reacted violently because of an unwanted sexual advance that was made upon them. A defendant will use available legal defenses against assault and murder, with the aim of seeking an acquittal, a mitigated sentence, or a conviction of a lesser offense. A defendant may allege to have found the same-sex sexual advances so offensive or frightening that they were provoked into reacting, were acting in self-defense, were of diminished capacity, or were temporarily insane, and that this circumstance is exculpatory or mitigating.

in most societies there is a right to live

Is there? Seems like a pay-to-win system.

Like I can’t just walk into a pharmacy and buy something that kills me.

You absolutely can, it just won’t be a fun way to go.

Florida Man out here doing this every day of his life

They’ve hated each other for nearly a century and haven’t seemed to figure it out yet. I’m not holding my breath.

Nonsense. We have lots of Democrats who revere Bush and Reagan. We still have some Nixon diehards.

MAGA will endure. Propagandists will get to work. Once he’s dead, the hagiographies can really begin.

They’ll be building statues to Trump for another 50 years.

Sorry. Liberal Democracy says he got the most electoral college votes based on a partial sampling of an enfranchised subset of the population.

So he’s the best man for the job

We did this after his first term.

He still got reelected.

Okay, but that just proves how profitable it all is

Come ooooooon hurricane season. You have the chance to do the funniest thing

Plenty of people do both.

I don’t think Facebook, strictly speaking, is the problem though. In my experience, it’s the social isolation and poor quality of care that is all too common among Americans young and old alike.

Facebook is a lampry on the neck of a dying man.

The networking effect in action.

If you’ve got a dedicated group of friends on a platform and you can’t figure out how to move them all at once, you’re unlikely to socially isolate yourself just because they ratchet up the enshittification another rung.

silently

But when they have better AI you guys want the country to bend over and get fist fucked.

It’s legit infuriating to see the Chinese economy investing in bluesky R&D, which has the long term benefit of better software, cheaper hardware, and more useful technology. All while American politicians insist “We need to build more hand cranks and charcoal fire pits to power our billionaire sponsored CSAM engines!”

All this while US Tech Companies turn increasingly to religious hacks to launder their shitty apps and platforms.

Listen, is it GOOD that navy officers would rather light their own ship on fire than spend another week in the Persian Gulf? Absolutely.

But, broadly speaking, is this how you’d like a Navy to operate? Seems like no.

Human email has been a statistical anomaly since the 90s