she rejects science she doesn’t like when it comes to transgender science
I don’t think so… her content on trans people sounds almost as impartial as it could be, but prove me wrong if you have a better source
I think you should watch her content and draw your own conclusions about her instead of trusting clickbait-y articles or lemmy upvotes
I wonder how much corporations are paying her to push this swill against open research that’s publicly owned.
Probably nothing. I’ve been following her for a while and it seems to me she’s just been betrayed and disappointed by academia to an extreme that made her turn a 180 and defend private funding, when that’s clearly doomed from the start.
I wouldn’t take these bits too seriously, but she does make good arguments overall and exposes some real problems and concerns that I’ve also seen as a grad student in a different field. I can’t agree that privatization is the way forward, but there’s more to her channel than that. I follow mostly because she’s a great explainer of the more complex concepts in quantum physics, and overall seems to know well what she’s talking about when it’s in her field.
the quote comes from this video where Sabine reported - over 1y ago - how she lost trust in the peer review process of scientific research in the field of physics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shFUDPqVmTg
6min 55s
words? Where we’re going to we don’t need words
imagine government regulating what kinds of feelings are allowed in mind ads
we’re screwed
KDE on endeavouros works with HDR for me (latest drivers). Ubuntu is usually a few months behind on updates, but I wouldn’t expect plasma 6 to crash every time when trying HDR. I hope you’re able to narrow down the cause, or have a magical update that fixes it.
I hate making out wearing glasses. That said, it is a porn category 🤷♂️
but don’t you need kernel access to verify everything that is running
and it runs mafia the old country, which doesn’t have multi player crap or microtransactions, so yeah, absolute win
laying them off might save their lives, they should find another job
at least 2 breeding heifers
There’s no reason to believe it’s mostly unsafe. And even if that’s the case, changing from unsafe rust to safe is less of a leap than cpp to rust.
no shit, pick any post that mentions AI here and see who are the first ones to comment every single time.
If you don’t want a “cycle of negativity”, maybe let’s not throw rocks at anything for just bringing up the topic?
how’s acknowledging this herd behavior contributing to it. Some of us are also tired of reading the same crap in the comments.
It’s not a why not response. I’m asking back why do you think it wouldn’t be worth it even as a literal translation from C++, because in my view, that would be a first step towards a proper Rust port, and it still brings benefits to the table.
I’d give her a pass for being 15
Why it wouldn’t be? Surely not having idiomatic rust doesn’t eliminate other benefits of switching to the language, like better tooling, memory safety, and perhaps more people willing to contribute. Over time the codebase can be improved but the main goal in the transition seems to not break existing functionality, which they seem to have accomplished for LibJS.
out of context?
Please coordinate with us before starting any porting work so nobody wastes their time on something we can’t merge.
If you look at the code, you’ll notice it has a strong “translated from C++” vibe. That’s because it is translated from C++. The top priority for this first pass is compatibility with our C++ pipeline. The Rust code intentionally mimics things like the C++ register allocation patterns so that the two compilers produce identical bytecode.
that seems reasonable to me
yeah, this part of the community is as insufferable as the overly enthusiastic vibe coders
multiple times a day for me
new kink unlocked