Rusty shackleford, checking in

You’re giving the guy a lot of grace. Admitting that there could be other reasons why tall guys can be partnered with short girls, especially when given objective evidence supporting these other reasons, is not impeded by a language barrier, not at the fluency level at which they’re otherwise communicating.

Nowhere in this thread do they admit it could be for reasons other than their personal theory.

That’s just having a poorly justified opinion and doubling down on it when confronted with evidence to the contrary, which deserves to be called out.

Again. Someone pointed out that in general women prefer men that are like 8" taller whereas men prefer women who are 3" shorter, and you refuse to talk about how it might not be the man preferring a very short wife, but the wife preferring a very tall man.

Instead you double down on “damn, them be some child-like features the men are going for”.

What does that tell everyone? You are CHOOSING to interpret a height differential to be about child like features, ignoring evidence to the contrary.

Why would you choose that?

I don’t personally think that’s what you’re into. But I think you have a poorly justified opinion.

You can have stupid feelings, especially once they concern how you treat others. There’s a big difference between “idk why, but I really like cherry flavored ice cream” and “idk why, but these people make me feel uncomfortable”, because the latter opens you up to treating others with prejudice.

It’s your job to wrestle with them and make sure your feelings are justified, or to change your mind.

You didn’t address it, so I gotta ask, did you read the part about causation at all?

How do you handle the plex metadata side of things? I’m trying to do something similar.

I love framework computers, but unless you’re working with LLMs and can leverage the high VRAM, you’re better off building your own desktop if you’re comfortable. The desktop represents a very specific niche, and the repairability of a traditional ITX desktop handedly beats that of the framework desktop.

Trump does love the uneducated…

Kpop demon hunters

Fwiw I use a fork called Apollo because it enables a headless setup

I believe this is where reusable water balloons can come into play

You got it! Best of luck with the baby

There are multiple wifi-connected solar powered cameras that will do the motion-activation, IR night mode, etc. thing that you’re asking for, that you can just drop into a location, but they won’t be self hosted.

Unfortunately pretty much everything you’d self host takes time and finagling, it’s just the price of privacy/independence. I know you’re asking for a self hosted solution but that will be difficult with little free time. I’ve been running frigate for a year and I still can’t get some object detection masks to properly ignore detections.

You’ll want to be running frigate, a self hosted nvr solution.

Camera wise, you’ll probably want a power over Ethernet (poe) amcrest or hikvision camera for continuous video to be sent to the nvr to do the detection. A list of recommended hardware is found here.

I’ll be honest though, depending on where this is you might be better off with a non-self hosted setup. For example, reolink makes several battery/solar powered wifi cameras that record on motion, shooting notifications to your phone. No cables to run

Because it’s a one-time tax that applies retroactively.

If you move, you’d still owe it.

Cough FIFA peace prize

Yeah. Biden fucked up by running again.

Voters sealed the deal though.

TSMC was developed by a Taiwanese citizen to be a “silicon shield” - it’s too valuable for other countries to risk a war.

It’s why trump was trying to cajole TSMC to move 50% production to the US and they were like “nah”

They’re working on it. The ships have goddamn feet

Soooo China is building sophisticated, highly specialized barges for establishing a beachhead without a harbor and moving heavy machinery across. These would be pretty helpful in a sustained campaign against Taiwan.

These ships happen to be able to connect to the many Chinese “civilian” roll on-roll off (roro) ferries that are built to military spec and can handle Chinese tanks.

These “civilian” roros happen to participate in military exercises.

Considering this all took place well before the arms deal, that’s probably a good reason why China can be considered the aggressor. Maybe the $11.1 billion in arms deals is in response to that?

There’s also xi jinping saying that the unification of Taiwan and China is “unstoppable” in a speech today, right after these military exercises.