• 0 Posts
  • 2.11K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle








  • In a direct confrontation, the US would walk over them as if they aren’t there. That’s why you don’t do that, you apply guerilla tactics. That’s why a bunch of basically goat herders in Afghanistan, of all places, managed to beat the Russians and the Americans.

    Let there be no doubt, the US got its ass handed there, and Afghanistan is a good part of the reasons why the USSR folded.

    I assume the Danish generals know this and likely have prepared something similar, but now with highly trained and well equipped soldiers.

    I think an invasion of Greenland would finish the US, especially since the Danes have a lot of experience in how to fight winter conditions while the US not so much.

    I think something similar applies as well in, for example, Mexico. There are boat loads of highly (US military) trained criminals over there with a lot of experience in sending messages. Once the hundredth soldier was found dangling from a bridge, or cut up in a salad, it might become hard to explain to Maga base why really is worth it.

    The US is awesome at invading. It absolutely sucks at keeping anything









  • Nah, AI will already do that automatically because any and all system loses something in inefficiencies. Same like if you put a theoretical 100 miles of gas worth in your tank that turns into 20 in practice because the combustion engine has an efficiency of 30ish%, you have air and tire resistance, etc etc.

    AI has the same for information, and what comes out is always a certain fraction of the 100% that went in

    Since poisoning the pool makes AI unreliable up to the point where it becomes useless, it has the potential to stop the AI madness. I’d be all for that.