• obbeel@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is very interesting. And what kind of platform wouldn’t process citizen data on the EU, I wonder?

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Would a decade in prison be a tariff? If not, maybe the execs would prefer that, rather than make the company pay the fine. Won’t someone think about the company?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They call it a ‘tariff’, I call it a light slap on the wrist. Add a few zeros to make the fine match the damage, EU!

  • Susurrus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is neither new nor surprising. They casually break EU-US personal data transfer agreements like they’re nothing. They know perfectly well they will be fined, but they profit infinitely more from breaking EU law than they have to pay up in fines. It’s a simple business decision. The EU Comission is being very lenient here, like they’ve been for years.

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They are used to not having to respond to rules and laws and make more money than the fines take so it is a business as usual, and the reason is that “they” in this context is not human. It is an entity of raw unapologetic competitor for ending planet earth, an entity that strives only for profit and harvest any human in the way, even those inside it that help it. There exist no compassion or afterthought for if human lives are worth anything, instead if one of the zealot lawyers in its show any sign of not obeying they are replaced so that the giant demonic machine can ensure that every human inside it is currently doing their best to betray their own race. All the blood money from profits is available to use for this goal, but also the minds of humans that can strategically plant comments and enact articles like this, where they play off the political divide and wars and destruction of the planet. Only to distract even, they don’t need anything but time until we die out so they can focus on profits more

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let them operate just a couple years more and the far right will win elections in half of the eu.

    Are these people blind? Can’t they see who’s pushing the idiot propaganda?

    • Aliktren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Can you imagine the backlash if governments started banning social media, banning politics on social media seems more doable but also problematic

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This isn’t just about a fine; the Commission forcing us to change our business model effectively imposes a multibillion-dollar tariff on Meta

    Technically true I guess, (A Fine is a Price, U Gneezy) but only since it’s not enough of a fine. Make it €200 billion instead of €200 million.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      If your business model is violating personal rights, you should have never made it a business model in the first place. Same goes for anti-competetive actions that violate the laws.

    • Skydancer@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They could have imposed up to €55 billion across the two companies. That doubles for repeat offenders. This was clearly meant as a warning.

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes fuck because a demonic data harvesting entity is not okay with humans. In our contry we do not have corpos deciding laws, it’s also very illegal because corporations are not human and considered gods like in your empire. Hope this helps to explain

  • thericofactor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    2 days ago

    Of course they want to politicize this. And the EU is being far too careful here, these amounts are only 1.5% of the maximum penalty. They got off easy

  • Hikuro-93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Looking forward to where this goes if Europe sticks to its guns when things get ugly. Let them belittle us, let them antagonize, misdirect and make fun.

    We haven’t even started pressing where it really hurts the US and its oligarchs. Which is precisely their precious digital exports we all consume and barely tax.

    Never give in to bullies. Absolutely never, no matter how enticing or harmless they make it seem. Watch them repeat a Trump-China by poking the bear then sheepishly back down and say “Europe needs to make a deal with us” when it bites their behind.

  • als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    The cost of doing business for them. Make the fines actually proportional and ongoing until they stop breaking the laws

  • lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    Meta calls its penalty a ‘tariff’

    That’s a retaliatory tariff. Meta broke the law, and the EU retaliated.

  • Rose56@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Penalty Tariff ? no, no Meta, this is what you need to pay monthly, for all the data you sell and use without consent!

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      €200 million per month for all European users data is likely well within ‘cost of business’ for Facebook…