Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoEasy, it's uuuuuuuuh…discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down10
arrow-up114arrow-down1imageEasy, it's uuuuuuuuh…discuss.tchncs.deNatanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoYo ill be 100 with you. Regex is where something like an LLM excells. Don’t rely on an llm for coding, but… This is exactly where it should be in your toolbox.
minus-squarenoctivius@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agothis is funny i have totally opposite experience
minus-squarecircuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI don’t disagree with this hot take. But the major difference is the sheer resources needed to have an LLM in place of a “do one thing right” utility like sed. In that sense, they are incomparable.
minus-squarebus_factor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoI think they’re arguing for having the LLM generate the regex. And I certainly would not trust an LLM to do that right.
Yo ill be 100 with you.
Regex is where something like an LLM excells.
Don’t rely on an llm for coding, but… This is exactly where it should be in your toolbox.
this is funny i have totally opposite experience
I don’t disagree with this hot take. But the major difference is the sheer resources needed to have an LLM in place of a “do one thing right” utility like sed. In that sense, they are incomparable.
I think they’re arguing for having the LLM generate the regex. And I certainly would not trust an LLM to do that right.