• FancyLad @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    One time, I got a job at a large, chain electronics store as a warehouse associate. They already had a guy there named Tim, but they immediately decided that they liked me more than him, and renamed that Tim (that worked there for 2 years) to “Other Tim.”

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh snap! I once worked somewhere that already had a guy with my name and he asked me to use some other name. I thought that was bad enough (and told him no). But this is next level.

  • OrangeEnot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honorifics work well in cases like this. Call the cat Connor-sama and the human Connor-kun.

  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jokes aside, it’s probably easier for the cat to learn to ignore “Human Connor” than it is to learn a new name for themselves, right?

    • Chris@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s probably easier for the human to recognise “Human Connor” than it is for the cat to learn a new name, right?

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The cat isn’t going to understand ‘human’ either, so it’s just <human noises> CONNER <more human noises, where are the treats?>

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I know that’s a joke, but I worked with a friend who’d regularly discuss 4chan with me. I also sadly witnessed him slowly go from just laughing at Trump to supporting him, though that was back in 2015-2016. I moved and stopped using Facebook, so I haven’t had any recent contact with him.

      Edit whoops, this is cats. If politics isn’t allowed here I can edit this.

      • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        He’s upset enough that he voiced his preference. Choosing to ignore that stated preference might be fine in this context, or it might not be. But, assuming that someone is not actually upset about a behavior that they’ve requsted change seems like an unnecessary leap of faith.

          • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I mean, we can only go off of what is presented in the story, while acknowledging it’s 4chan and therefore both fake and gay. Within that frame, the new guy has been tagged with a nickname, he has mentioned to his colleagues that he’d prefer they not call him the nickname, and they are continuing to call him the name he’s expressly said he’d prefer they didn’t use. That’s a textbook hostile work environment, at a minimum.