• Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean it’s like if you prefer apples or oranges, there’s no ethical principle at stake, you’re allowed to like either one or both. It’s simply not a moral question.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, I don’t see it as apples or oranges, but more like eating or not eating. Stopping people from eating is morally bad and vice-versa, giving people food is morally good. Apply that to gay sex directly without thinking about the implications of the analogy too hard. Ergo, homosexuality is morally good (but so is hetero-, bi- and even asexuality (the analogy breaks down too much)).