Nato is holding closed-door meetings with film and TV screenwriters, directors and producers across Europe and the US, the Guardian can reveal, prompting accusations the alliance is seeking to use the arts to generate “propaganda” for the bloc.

The alliance has held three meetings with film and TV professionals in Los Angeles, Brussels and Paris and is due to continue its “series of intimate conservations” next month in London, meeting with screenwriter members of the Writers’ Guild of Great Britain (WGGB), which represents professional writers in the UK.

The planned meeting in London has caused consternation among some of those invited, who felt they were being asked to “contribute towards propaganda for Nato”.

The topic of conversation at the meeting, to be held under the Chatham House rule – in which participants are free to use information received, but identities of attenders are not revealed – will be the “evolving security situation in Europe and beyond”. Former Nato spokesperson James Appathurai, who is now deputy assistant secretary general for hybrid, cyber and new technology, is understood to be planning to attend, along with other officials from the alliance.

In a WGGB email seen by the Guardian, it was suggested that the meetings had already led to “three separate projects” in development, which were “inspired, at least in part, by these conversations”.

[…]

Alan O’Gorman, writer of the film Christy, which won best film at the 2026 Irish Film & Television Awards, called the planned meeting “outrageous” and “clearly propaganda”.

“I thought it was tone deaf and crazy to present this as some sort of positive opportunity. A lot of people, myself included, have friends and family or themselves come from countries that are not in Nato, that have suffered under wars that Nato has joined and propagated,” he said.

He thinks the meetings are an attempt by Nato to “get some of its messaging out there in film and TV”.

“I think there’s fearmongering throughout Europe at the moment that our defences are down,” he said. “I see it in an Irish context, where there’s been a push through some of the media and government to present Nato in a positive light and align ourselves more closely with them. I think the Irish people, for the most part, don’t want anything to do with wars on foreign lands.”

Defence spending in Ireland has increased to record levels following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which has received cross party support and broad approval from the public, though support for joining Nato remains low. An Ipsos poll last year found, should a united Ireland be formed, that 49% half of all voters in the Republic of Ireland are opposed to joining the alliance, with 19 per cent in favour and 22 per cent not sure.

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The presumption may be right, but it’s also entirely-possible that people have finally figured-out that unless you open-up, & communicate what-we’re-doing, and our-process ( ANY organization ), THEN conspiracism takes-root & fills-the-gap.

    & there’s also the problem of idiotic-framing: “it doesn’t affect me” … when said about the fascists coming for others … until there was nobody left to protest when they came for me…

    we’ve all seen that line…

    the same is true of imperialist-psychopaths.

    “they aren’t coming for me, therefore I don’t care” is the same head-in-sand ignoring/denial, just in greater scope.

    It is aggressors who decide how much defensive-capability is required, not making-believing.

    The fact that we won’t provide all girls in school with aikijutsu or jujutsu or something, makes force-reducing the rape-rate not happen.

    As someone pointed out a couple weeks ago: the ONLY charges for the Epstein Files … are charges for illegally sharing secrets, NOT for child-rape…

    So, enforcement is pretend, for that category-of-crime.

    Then “arming” girls becomes the only way that rape’s going to be mitigated, right?

    The same is true at country-scale.

    We falsely told Ukraine we’d protect them, if they just give-up their nukes…

    so they did…

    & then Russia invaded, & we … mostly sat on our hands, until Zelenskiy’s “I don’t need a ride: I need ammunition!” speech.

    We could have solidly-backed them while Russia was building-up for their invasion…

    but head-in-sand prevailed, & some of us remember what Russia did to Mariupol, from what we saw in the images… shortly thereafter.

    So long as aggressors are a real threat, then fighting-capability is required.

    Not having that capability means … sooner or later … becoming their carrion.

    As Canada is going to be finding-out when Trump’s soon-to-be-dictatorship annexes Canada & Greenland, & sets about enforcing his “Greater North America” ( modeled on Netanyahu’s “Greater Israel” … including much/all of Lebanon, same with Syria, etc… ) “Manifest Destiny” imperialism…

    Trump NEEDS Greenland to force-butcher Canada more efficiently.

    WE need to be armed-to-the-teeth.

    The time of rule-of-law’s nearly done: the time of rule-of-bullets is going to begin, soon.

    The world’s times change.

    & ruthless objectivity increases one’s likelihood of surviving the coming mess.

    _ /\ _