• panthera_@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Intelligent design simply believes that the universe and life was created by an intelligent agency. There are no religious texts. When women didn’t have the equipment or time to shave, they didn’t. Removing body hair enhances a women’s sexuality but is not required for eroticism no more than makeup or perfume.

    The topic is whether men find tattoos on women attractive not evidence for intelligent design.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If your argument hinges on “intelligent design is real and The Creator™ made men hate tattoos” you need to prove the first part before the second can be “true.” If intelligent design is not real then no creator made men hate tattoos, simple as.

      • panthera_@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Incorrect. I presented a survey which said that most men find tattoos on women attractive if they are small and in hidden locations. There is no requirement to give a reason. The article didn’t give a reason.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          No, you are the one ascribing the reason without any evidence to support it, of course the article doesn’t back up your delusions, but that is the point, the article does not back up your delusions.