No one said otherwise.

The original commenter said they hadn’t seen anyone fuck up this bad since Bush. The responder is simply implying that they think the covid response was an equally bad fuck up.

Interesting.

Anyway, skill diff! See ya!

The potential coverings would have to be exactly the shape of the dress because of the sleeves, no? We would see the shade passing underneath? Like onto the obvious clothing rack underneath the left sleeve?

for sure bro, you’re really trolling me 😎

My arguments haven’t even touched on those areas 😭 can you stop being annoying? I’m not gonna fall for your troll bait, so if you keep being annoying, I’ll just block you lmao.

Which goalpost did I move?

Maybe I’m just an elevated being but I can clearly tell that the righthand side is a mirror on a wall and that the tan below it is where the floor meets the wall. Because of that, I can roughly make out the angle and know that we should be seeing some shade on the side if any existed in the first place.

Does that make sense?

Debate vs discussion semantics.

Debate regards the color.

Discussion regards the overall cultural effect, studies in neuroscience, etc

So the idea is that the dress is, what, covered in an exactly dress shaped and sized amount of shade? Or else why wouldn’t we see shade anywhere else?

The fact that the real color wasn’t widespread knowledge from the get go. 🥱🥱

💀

You’re welcome! Thank you for disregarding facts because they don’t align with your narrative!

If anything, I’m more interested in how THAT color is being interpreted than the dress itself. Does it become shade to people because they perceive it relative to the dress? Because, I mean, we know that it is factually light. So how are people perceiving it to be the absence of light? Can you explain that bit?

Hey, just arguing with you in a different comment chain now. So, like, I see the optical illusion. But the background is clearly yellow in the picture? So I don’t understand how your brain is interpreting that part? To me it seems like you’re ignoring the background of the image for this point. Can you go more in depth on that part, specifically? Does that yellow light look blue to you?

Ah yes, that’s why you’re defending yourself relentlessly against a stranger on the internet. It’s because you don’t care. You’re so detached and cool 😎

I do recall, that’s why I started trolling you when I noticed the vulnerability you have to it.

The wider debate, dawg. When everyone knew the truth, the debate over what color the dress was died or at least started dying. There may have been people who continued debating without that knowledge, and there are certainly people who continued discussing afterwards. The debate can only be one of two things: either it’s the color of the dress or the color of the picture of the dress. The question has TWO objective answers. Most people, again, not knowing the wider context when they entered the conversation, took a position based on what they thought the color of the ACTUAL DRESS was. And when that objective question was answered, everyone stopped caring. You know, the royal everyone. Society at large.

Also… reading comprehension, dawg. NO ONE knew what the color of the dress was when the quiz went viral except for the originators of the image and their real life social circle/community which had been discussing it. The tumblr bit is almost completely irrelevant to what you’re trying to argue.

It’s kinda funny, tho, don’t you think? For you to be this mad AND wrong?

Ah man, for sure. Don’t worry! Everyone who sees this WILL know how emotionally invested you were. You made probably like 30 comments, after all. Enjoy your day buckaroo!

For sure man, you’re winding me up…