No has said it because it’s not true.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.deto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Canon requires an account to transfer images from your camera. Forces you to sign up using Chrome.English9·3 months agoThere’s a general negative attitude towards chromium browsers due to some anticompetitive practices pulled by Google in addition to privacy concerns and probably some more issues I’m not aware of. So that includes chrome, but also edge and most other chromium based browsers.
CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.deto A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world•Judge finds police acted reasonably in shooting New Mexico man while at wrong address3·3 months agoIt is. Either we need guns for protection and it is okay to point them at people in certain circumstances, or we don’t need guns for protection and they should be outlawed beyond certified uses like sport shooting, hunting, and collecting. I don’t understand your seeming belief that guns are okay to own, but not okay to use.
CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.detoHacker News@lemmy.bestiver.se•Serverless Is a ScamEnglish1·4 months agoContainers aren’t an alternative to serverless computing. That’s like saying “roads are a scam, I’ll just drive my car instead.” The only serverless compute service they mention, Lambda, literally allows you to deploy custom containers.
CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.deto Technology@lemmy.world•Python Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()English1·5 months agoIt’s not the same, and you kinda answered your own question with that quote. Consider what happens when an object defines both dunder bool and dunder len. It’s possible for dunder len to return 0 while dunder bool returns True, in which case the falsy-ness of the instance would not depend at all on the value of len
It’s not stupid. Most cars will signal whether or not they are locked properly on the second press.