There is a difference between falsehood and untruths. If you give a partial answer it can be “not false” and also fail to be truth. Suppose he is asked about the economy and he says some sector is doing good but doesn’t mention the ones doing bad, is he lying? You get false information even though what he says is true.

they confirmed him dead a little after he was shot, right? would give em some more time

While that does make sense, I think I’ll stick to thinking they’re plural.

what sort of honoric is et al, does it make you plural?

I dont think anything is wrong with the format. Mango is replaced with fruit > subversion of expectation > bondburger (which is always wrong in wordplay so it double works)

kibty

So it must be banned just like the books at the library that republicans deem harmful.

This is like the worst false equivalence I have ever seen.

I mean… some drugs (the medicine kind) are prescribed with birth control because they’re bad for babies. Is meth not bad for the baby?

Also, if I may, what exactly is the criteria for something to be eugenics? I am not well informed; would, for example, not allowing people who wear black socks to have kids be eugenics?