For the comment higher towards you I really did mean that as a general clarification. I would’ve worded it more strongly otherwise. I wasn’t entirely sure if you realized it or not given your wording, so I wanted to make sure less familiar people reading on that were more clear.

The cherry picking comment was not to you, it was to their person it’s replied to. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just misread the comment chain

$15 isn’t a living wage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_minimum_wage

And you’re every so politely ignoring the states run by dems having higher min wages, to pretend that it’s only Republicans getting shit done. Notably just like there isn’t a $15 min national wage, there’s also not a national abortion ban. Your comparison is poorly cherry picked.

Cloud storage is a good thing. Dependency on it is bad, and doubly so when it’s large corpos

Once you have the tech fully worked out, the budget to make them is going to be cheaper. Easier for all nations to get their own

Images would likely be the easiest possible thing to translate compared to more arbitrary codes since in that situation the output should be more easily decodable?

Also, there’s plenty of easy solutions to that.

Imagine if she ran on a $15 an hour minimum wage increase

To be extremely clear. THAT WAS ONE OF HER POLICIES

Good politician is generally taken to mean good at corralling the other politicians into passing your agendas, at least how I usually see it use. Like how people call McConnell a “good” politician . Idk tho

Tbh I wouldn’t be surprised. The bigger question is, does it cause more cancer than it prevents

As a bicyclist and pedestrian, many roads are above safe levels. Others it’s well below. Tbh it’s all arbitrary

That’s saving, not spending… Those things don’t hit the accounts for something like 48 hours.

I understood. I’m saying there’s a whole lot less reason to boycott if they become union

Unions can make even horrible companies treat their workers with decency… Or at least pay them for the bad treatment. Shop union.

instead we should discourage people from filing civil suits entirely by making sure only people who can afford to pay the defendants’ lawyers fees will file them

That’s not how it plays out in reality.

Why? That accomplishes only increased government costs when the same accessibility could be brought about by allowing the loser of the case to take on reasonable lawyer fees of both people.

I mean you stayed.

If the public defenders are good enough for everyone else

as a present which is not the case, since they’re not in civil lawsuits

Yeah. That’s the proper response to your statement being wrong. Lol. . .

Yes, the system has issues–the issue being that the loser in the suit doesn’t take the burden of reasonable attorney costs for both parties. That alone would fix most of it. Government doesn’t need to give anyone a right to a civil lawyer.

You don’t get a public defender for civil lawsuits, which are the majority of those kinds of lawsuits. So no, public defenders aren’t good enough for everyone, because they don’t exist for civil lawsuits.

Honestly I’ve had a different experience. I’ve been wrong, as anyone ever has, on the Internet. And usually the person I’m arguing will accept an apology with grace, and will even get upvotes for doing so. But the apology doesn’t need to be accepted, to still be good to do.

Conviction of attempted election interference should be an automatic life sentence imo…