So French pig ends up just sounding like oui?

Pretty sure it’s from the first episode

I feel like everyone “acted” right leaning when we were teenagers.

We used “gay” as a derogatory. I recall friends and I using talking points that in hindsight was very incelly. Mocking idealistic lefties etc.

But I don’t think I truly felt that way, and I know my friends I’ve kept in touch with post high school don’t/didn’t.

I think a lot of it is performative, to fit in. And now I’m an openly raging lefty

I hope it’s the same case with kids these days

I assumed NAZA was a clever acronym for North American Zionist Alliance, also sounds like NASA and… That other word.

Unless they’re not white tho

Unfortunately it’s not just a US or a “in Okinawa” problem. It’s a problem as old as civilisations have had militaries and sent them to other countries.

I’m not saying there’s no point in trying to fix it but… It’s pervasive in time and space.

You joke, but I can literally see someone, or some bot, posting that shit.

I remember someone saying something about babies dying in a tweet, not mentioning, or even about the genocide, and some tool called them anti-semetic… Like telling on yourself a bit there

Also showing that the people who made the ad are out of touch with real people.

Who can just afford to buy a random TV on a whim with no research?

Good old Poes law.

That person’s exact phrasing was how the right responded to any attempt to come up with a solution to a recent mass gun violence episode

I understand your point but that feels a bit like a zero sum game.

If people like zone out action games, and those games are made and sell reasonably well, and people enjoy them… Isn’t that fine?

Yeah maybe it’s shit quality for the amount of money/talent behind it and it could have been better etc… But that feels a bit like people who play every cod version ever complaining about indie games having “bad graphics” or being too hard etc. They’re different games for different audiences.

Or kill musk?

Yeah fair point.

There’s probably studies/data on some of this, but for a thinly veiled argument that people use in bad faith I wasn’t going to go that in depth.

The one “truth” is that it “reduces the risk of cancer”… Because technically chopping anything off reduces the risk of cancer, because that thing can no longer get it.

However foreskin cancer is not exactly a high cause for concern, and by this logic cutting off your ears and nose would be more logical.

Phht. I just downloaded porn on kazaa and limewire, which invariably ended up being a virus, and then my dad yelled at me asking why the the browser kept trying to go to “Britney spears sucks dick” websites and I got banned from the computer for months

Wait, if that’s true and why he’s said pro ccp bs then I feel like he’s being judged too harshly.

It is very hard, without writing a mini essay, to convey all the relavent context, tone and meaning via a text based comment.

Often what people write will end up being interpreted differently by people reading it and different to your intentions.

Also the, for lack of a better term, “dog pile” effect really matters. If the first few people down vote you, that changes how successive people will interpret your message. “Maybe it seems harmless but it’s -3, so I might have missed some context and it’s more nefarious than I realised” etc.

The older stickers look brand new. Even if that car had been around then, they’d be super faded

They just strapped a parachute to a real kiwi, chucked it out of a plane and took a photo

Assuming that doesn’t y do fucky things with structural integrity… That’s pretty clever

Except that one time when you win on a technicality in a tie by “who got the most points a specific way”