I only played W2 and W3. W2 was not necessary to play the third one, but it’s certainly not a bad game (I personally didn’t like it as much due to the fairly linear story telling). W1 I am told is not that great. Both are much shorter than the complete edition of Witcher 3 I’d argue. The DLC should be fine if added afterwards, I can wholeheartedly recommend both. Blood & Wine especially has received wide praise back then as “being a whole game in the shape of a DLC” .

Thronebreaker is a tales-game that I haven’t had the time for yet. I was told it’s solid.

The Witcher Adventure Game is essentially a board game and is absolutely not necessary for any of the other games. If you like board games and have people to play it with, it’s actually quite good. It has a bit of a learning curve and I very much recommend reading or watching whatever tutorial you can grab a hold of, because it is not all that intuitive.

Considering your other reply, I am appalled and disgusted. In addition, it appears to me you have either not read or understood my comment, and I am not sure which is worse.

So … we should’ve hanged all the Germans in '45? The child soldiers drafted in Berlin? Shot the entire Japanese army? Drag all US-citizens to court for acting against the constitution?

I am going to be downvoted to oblivion, but: Lock up all Palestinians for not extraditing terrorists and war criminals?

Where do you think this will go, honestly? How is any of that justified, or fair? Should we commit a genocide of our own upon the Israelis? I know that’s not what you said and I very much hope it’s not what you meant.

This platform sometimes, fuck me.

While I do recognise the colloquial and unserious tone of your argument, I have to disagree wholeheartedly: Human right are universal.

I know a town with I think five or six large furniture (or general household item) stores basically next to each other. Big brands.

It is probably a combination of factors: The area is easy to reach by car, it’s easy to supply by truck, plenty of space for storage and people actively come there to shop furniture - yes you will be competing with five different stores, but since the customer base travels quite a bit anyway, you’d be stupid to set up shop in a different town. People will walk/drive 5 minutes to check a different store if they already came all this way, but they probably won’t head to a store two towns over just to compare prices.

I mean, the plot of Ghost in the Shell sounds pretty close from what I recall: Poor people can only afford cheap bionics, but cannot repair or replace them once support ends.

Considering that the general consensus here already expects that? No. However if you look at the other comments and the downvotes, a significant number of people seem to forget that Palestinian civillians are being ground up between two millstones, not one.

What? Hamas, an organisation seeking to eradicate Jews, may be capitalising on the (righteous) public outcry of Israeli war crimes? They might even be lying? Absolutely impossible, my side ™ could do no wrong! (/s, obviously)

Not meaning to dispute your core argument, but your bar for “most disgusting company” is pretty low. There are factual companies out there profiting from war and famine, misinformation and oppression.