The legislature sets laws. The senate approves laws. The judiciary interprets laws.
If the legislature doesn’t like how a law is interpreted, they can change the wording to be less ambiguous, but it would still need to be approved by the senate. This new law would supersede any precedents.
The executive is there to keep the system functioning, not to create any laws itself.
I can’t believe that Elon Musks pet techno-SS brigade are dragging this poor Corgis name down.!
After this he joined DOGI and went to the Library of Congress.
Time to watch Glass Onion again.
Is this the same “Opt-In” as keeping Apple Intelligence disabled between software updates?
Apple are haemorrhaging a lot of hard earned goodwill every time they try to move forward with their own AI.
That still doesn’t give them the right to mine the data that their users entrusted to them though a paid service.
It doesn’t matter how anonymised their harvesting is, they had an agreement with their subscribers not to invade their privacy like this.
We are better off with a LLM that doesn’t work than abusing the data entrusted to them by their users.
It won’t be long until the LLM bubble bursts and we all laugh about how stupid we were to think they had any use whatsoever.
The currently executive in the US is either completely incompetent or maliciously trying to destroy the US.