It literally was the parents

https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/jury-finds-tesla-just-1-to-blame-for-teen-drivers-fiery-crash-in-fort-lauderdale/2809687

“Valet mode” also exists because valets were joyriding people’s Teslas

https://7news.com.au/news/north-america/joyriding-valet-in-texas-captured-on-dashcam-crashing-owners-tesla-c-1141954

I’m not saying you should be required to show it; just that if you can, and do, they should be barred from applying juvenile controls to the account held by you, an adult.

Why wouldn’t your management account for a car need to know whether you’re a licensed driver?

“Living through Y2K”? What does that even mean?

Remember, Tesla added this feature after widespread demand for parental controls on use following an incident in which a teenager killed themselves by driving too fast. People asked why they couldn’t override the car with parental controls if that feature was a technical possibility and there was even talk of using legal force to make them do it if they didn’t voluntarily comply.

Tesla requiring proof that the limited account belonged to a minor was not going to be permitted. Parents did this to us.

Maybe we need to find out why the worst people on Earth all have infinite missiles and drones to fire at the West

We need a “right to be treated as an adult” affirmed by Congress that prohibits use of parental controls against users who can demonstrate adulthood by presentation of ID

Google is insane about billing any random ass card you’ve ever used in any system adjacent to them. I had them bill a domain name fee to my fucking government travel card just because I’d set it up once to pay for a hotel or something. Completely not the card I’d put in to pay for the domain name - they just changed it on their own.

No; the First Amendment bars any government regulation on political speech.

An organization is able to bypass that by spending that money directly in support of the campaign, but not directly giving it to them

There have never been individual limits on indirect political support for issues or candidates because the First Amendment bars government regulation of your political speech.

It’s not a ruling about the rights of corporations!

They who? Implemented what?

There never were individual limits on political speech.

CU doesn’t rely on corporations being people. It relies on individuals having First Amendment rights.

People don’t have fewer rights under the First Amendment when they assemble to exercise them than they do individually. Citizens United was correctly decided and if you disagree, it’s because you think it’s a ruling that “corporations are people.”

When it’s actually a ruling that corporations are fictions.

The structural rigidity of an ISO shipping container comes from the corrugated walls; that’s how you can stack them. The walls have to be continuous for that to work. Once you start cutting holes in the walls to have windows and doors, you need to retrofit a stiffening frame or the container isn’t rigid enough. You need framing anyway in order to insulate and finish the interior walls.

But if you’re just going to put up a frame anyway, you may as well timber-frame a similar sized structure. You’re not getting anything from the container except a roof and two doors you won’t use, and it’s pretty cheap to roof a small structure too. Plus a lot of “container homes” wind up roofing the container anyway, since the used ones tend to have leaks.

It’s be cheaper to traditionally frame a same-sized structure and just make it look like a shipping container.

Literally South Africa’s entire case for “Gaza genocide” before the ICJ is predicated on the statements of the most right-wing Israeli leaders - often in positions that have no authority over the IDF - speak for their army and the intent of their operation to disarm Hamas and retrieve hostages.

But of course when you explore the statements of Palestinian leaders, you get “well they don’t speak for every Palestinian.”

It’s not illegal to develop nuclear weapons. It’s illegal to endanger people with nuclear materials, though

Good thing that it’s not a genocide, according to the UN definition and the ICJ, or some people might really be in trouble

Right up there with “why wont Twitter do something about these obscure Nazi accounts I retweet to my audience of 2 million”

Oh no, I don’t like the tokens generated by the hand-cranked token generator I won’t stop cranking

Isn’t that the point of a tiny home? That you can have a lot of them in a given space?