Wait till you use a Mac!

Somehow they saw that and said “Hold my Beer” and went out of their way to ensure their users get maximum RSI pain.

Which is illegal according to EPA regulations, last I knew.

Yeah, here we are.

I suppose step one would be to first understand the name and spelling of the business you are trying to make…

3-6 active sessions on different work trees isn’t unheard of either

Agent loops for SWE burn a LOT of tokens.

I’m unfortunately temporarily disabled and can’t use my hands for another 2 months. So I’ve leaned heavily into AI based workflows to keep my job in the meantime.

Aside from the nightmare of keeping quality high, not atrophying skills, and avoiding a lack of domain knowledge. It works reasonably okay.

Token usage is insane though. A productive day might cost a few hundred dollars in tokens all things considered. Quality is expensive as well, a good 1/4 of that are automated systems that exist to identify defects, quality, coherence…etc issues early.

Mixed bag.

There are legitimately high value problems that AI works well against. But ungoverned proliferation has a net negative ROI across complex and difficult to measure areas.

When applied expertly, it works great. When blindly handed to your entire workforce as a panacea, not so much

Oh, there are definitely ethical ways to use these models. It’s just that those methods are not being enforced by local counties or your governments. Thus, companies are able to do whatever the hell they want, which means it’s going to be unethical by default.

What we need is regulation, enforcement, and a stop letting these companies trample all over everything they want to.

Each new model of OpenAI’s has had increased costs. Where are you getting this trending down thing from?

Anthropic models have stayed largely the same.

I accidentally went to Google for the first time in months and was wtf’ing over how many results are sponsored.

The complaints about Kagi are valid, mostly, (there’s always that one guy that runs around complaining that Kagi uses Yandex). But damn I’ve gotten spoiled by the results and the ranking customization…

Because fans are not highly tuneable devices?

They vary greatly, even within the same device, even at the same rpm.

Did… Did you read the article?

I don’t know why you’re being downvoted, but you’re right. SpaceX made a lot of advancements on its rockets and in lowering the price per launch.

This is objective. This isn’t sentimental or arguable.

Well, the mortgage on a 120-year-old house, food, water, electricity, internet, phones, medical bills, and medication, and the usual modern necessity bits and pieces, add up to about $5k/m

Add on childcare and similar that’s $6.5k

:(

So most of it…

Love it.

It’s fine-tuned Kimi 2.5

They didn’t train this up for themselves.

It’s an OK model that is fast and cheap. It outperforms other models of the same price class, but it’s nowhere near Frontier model capability.

Lol did they create the image with AI as well?

A chart with a line going downwards to the left hand side as the chart rises to the right is completely wrong.

Anthropic literally ran the exact same marketing campaign with opus 4.

Same sensationalist headlines.

Let’s not completely forget they were suing based on patents that they filed after palworld was created for mechanics in palworld.

Which were just patents made based on extensions of previous patents and were dubious to begin with.

Firefox is partially in this position because the community really does not support Firefox. Every decision Firefox makes or Mozilla makes in an attempt to try and claw back their financial freedom away from Google, the community dumpsters them on. Then, on posts like this, the community turns around and dumpsters Firefox for being so financially dependent on Google.

FireFox was and is an awesome project, but unfortunately, without the financial backing of a large for-profit business, they cannot keep up with Chrome. Even then, FireFox, with an engineering team a quarter the size of Chrome’s, still manages to keep up, which is a god damn miracle.

Developing a browser that is fast, actually works with new web standards, stays up to date, and is adding features is incredibly difficult. It is a stupidly expensive endeavor, similar to the level of effort necessary for operating systems.

And unfortunately, there is no Linux equivalent for web browsers, at least not right now. There are some up-and-coming projects, but it’s going to be decades before they reach the level of maturity necessary to start competing against Chrome. At which point there may be so much standards capture that some of these browsers may find it impossible to actually catch up.

You know, I seem to see this rhetoric a lot, and it seems to be getting upvoted more now, which isn’t a good sign for Lemmy, but are you really surprised by this? Is this really a question? Are you really that under a rock?

If it’s rhetorical, then what’s the point? Is this just a petulant way to try and dumpster something without going through the effort of actually picking out a real problem with it, of which there are countless?

Is this starting an interesting discussion? Is this voicing an interesting opinion? What is the point of this exact kind of comment?

Maybe I’m just too autistic and I’m going off the rails here, but these are starting to itch like a form of “internet forum hives”.