Here in Canada, it’s half the cost for rice. I don’t imagine it’s that different in the US (at least, pre-tariffs). Assuming 2500Calories per day, I can get a year’s worth of Calories from rice for about 500CAD while it would cost me 1k CAD for the same on soda (calculated based on $1/2L of Crush cream soda).
No, see, you start with the assumption that everything is zero-sum, then you look at the other guy to see suffering and conclude that you must therefore be winning.
No, this doesn’t work for me. I imagine myself standing in the middle of the road where the camera would be. If I look left and right and see these two cars, it means they’re going in the same direction.
Make them bid for their place on the queue!
lowest charisma
What? This guy has one of the strongest cult followings of any human being I’ve ever heard of. How is that low charisma?
I would argue that it provides lots of value precisely because a programmer’s job is to think. Less time spent on brain-dead stuff means more time available to think.
It has nothing to do with the meaning. If your training set consists of a bunch of strings consisting of A’s and B’s together and another subset consisting of C’s and D’s together (i.e. []+ and []+ in regex) and the LLM outputs “ABBABBBDA”, then that’s statistically unlikely because D’s don’t appear with A’s and B’s. I have no idea what the meaning of these sequences are, nor do I need to know to see that it’s statistically unlikely.
In the context of language and LLMs, “statistically likely” roughly means that some human somewhere out there is more likely to have written this than the alternatives because that’s where the training data comes from. The LLM doesn’t need to understand the meaning. It just needs to be able to compute probabilities, and the probability of this excerpt should be low because the probability that a human would’ve written this is low.
I don’t think we would’ve had so many lessons on this in school if it didn’t need to be taught.
Have people just completely forgot how search engines work? If you search for two things and get shit results, it means those two things don’t appear together.
A sentence saying she had her ovaries removed and that she is fertile don’t statistically belong together, so you’re not even getting that.
It’s the only time where it’s relevant to the conversation, no? Why would you bring it up anywhere else?
I think at this point, it would be more economical to distill the water than to burn up contaminants.