Translated title: Indigenous people forced to pay westerners to not destroy their habitat

Although your claims might be true (we’ll see) they don’t address the argument you replied to which is that:

If you think that someone using AI is wrong because of the water or ecological impact then you should think much worse about people who chose to eat a meat burger instead of a vegetable one because the extra water usage and ecological impact are many many orders of magnitudes bigger than an AI prompt causes.

Ah the one humans make carry stuff instead of kill, safest bet.

I don’t faint when I hear about human murder but wouldn’t want human corpses on my timeline either

Yes

Maybe put a nsfw tag on the image of a corpse?

Idk, that water is important to save is the argument OP made, I just added context.

The majority of the plants we grow are fed to animals first which reduces the calories by over 8x. So if anyone wants to reduce their “plant murder” that’s a good place to start.

Not sure why I can’t just eat neither?

Some more context

You are ignoring the victim

The restaurant at the end of the universe has genetically engineered animals that want to be eaten. I don’t know if that is consent but it’s definitely unethical. Imagine genetically engineering woman to want to sleep with you. Creepy af.

Healthier? Not for the fish.

Killing fish is not necessary like you said. I understand there is negative effects but that’s not really related to my comment nor the article.

Another positive outcome

Animals aren’t inanimate objects to be rented

Someone tied up with a fancy rope is still tied up

Unless those shops sell flesh, Jesus’s words don’t really apply to that. He called the priests who practiced slaughter for money “violent robbers”