My experience is that while it’s useful for creating code from scratch it’s pretty alright if you give it a script and ask it to modify it to do something else.

For instance I have a cron job that runs every 15min and attempts to extract .rar files in a folder and email me if it fails to extract. Problem is if something does go wrong it emails me every 15minutes until I fix it. This is especially annoying if its stuck copying a rar at 99%.

I asked deepseek to store failed file names in a file and have the script ignore those files for an increasing amount of time for each failure. It did a pretty good job, although it changed the name of a variable halfway through (easy fix) and added a comment saying it fixed a typo despite changing nothing about that line. I probably probably would have written almost identical code but it definitely saved me time and effort

can he purge himself?

I agree with him on this one. Leopards meet face.

Man 36.2x the price i could stomach but that extra percent really kills it

Yeah but here is too small to meaningfully impact anything.

Best you can hope for is to build a reddit community and then offload them here (or discord as an intermediary) to actually talk freely.

Not to defend her, but she’s saying that the ““woke”” crowd is saying what she’s saying is as bigoted as segregated bathrooms. She’s racist for entirely independent reasons

It means you were a bad person, most kids are, that’s why we train them. You choose if you’re a bad person today. I would suggest apologizing to those you wronged in ways that still affect them (prolonged bullying, stealing that significantly ruined a business, hitting that caused long term physical or emotional damage etc). An apology is more than just words, and it won’t always make you feel better. This self reflection is good and healthy.

Space isn’t black its transparent, there’s just nothing behind it.

TheFatRat - Xenogenesis

3 pickled eggs

1. No self posts.

I strongly think this rule should change, it is important we are able to humanize each other, make our own arguments. Self posts are important way to do that. I think some guidelines to keep it constructive and high effort is warranted but an outright ban I’m against.

2. No meme/image/shitposting.

I’m fine with this, but maybe a weekly mega thread to blow off steam in would be healthy?

No calls for violence. Full stop.

I understand the legal obligations here. I’ll also point out the president elect is openly calling for widespread violence. If some can say “cops should shoot/arrest/deport <xyz>” that is a call for violence.

Mods, You have a hard, thankless job, so thank you.

Oh a 3rd definition, that definitely hurts the case that blockchain is vague ill defined term. If it were a well-defined term, there would be whitepapers defining it like merkle trees or bitcoin. Blockchain is just a marketing term defined by businesses, not scientists or engineers and thus is vague and variable.

I also don’t think your definition is a very good definition. Do you think git fundamentally changes when it moves from sha1 to sha256? Or are you referring to the fact that the payloads of cryptocurrency’s blockchain is required to be signed (just like you can optionally require git commits to be signed)? I don’t think that’s fundamental to blockchain either.

Only cryptographicly valid changes are allowed to blockchain state. All data can be modified in git.

No. You can’t modify the chain in git. Each commit is an immutable snapshot of the repository. To change history you have to create a new hash and then broadcast that to everyone that they should stop using the old one. Depending in how your network is setup you may onky have to convince a centralized server, or you might have to convince 51% of the actors on your network or you may just choose to only form a network that agrees with you. You could alter bitcoin’s blockchain too, but you’d need 51% of the network to agree with you.

Please share a source! I can’t find anything as robust as a whitepaper (the bitcoin whitepaper doesn’t use the term).

NIST informally defines it as:

A distributed digital ledger of cryptographically-signed transactions that are grouped into blocks. Each block is cryptographically linked to the previous one (making it tamper evident) after validation and undergoing a consensus decision. As new blocks are added, older blocks become more difficult to modify (creating tamper resistance). New blocks are replicated across copies of the ledger within the network, and any conflicts are resolved automatically using established rules.

Which git certainly meets this.

IBM informally defines it as:

Blockchain is a shared, immutable ledger that facilitates the process of recording transactions and tracking assets in a business network. An asset can be tangible (a house, car, cash, land) or intangible (intellectual property, patents, copyrights, branding).

Which git meets.

Blockchain is a nebulous buzzword with a vague meaning. But I have yet to see a sensible definition of a blockchain that doesn’t include git. At the end of the day they are both just Merkle trees.

Git is pretty useful imo.