See the green parts? The ranting is to prevent them from turning yellow, or blue.

She is a commoner. How else could she raise her kids?

That depends on why the workers unionized.

Companies could restructure and hire everybody as independend contractors, paying for work and not time.

If companies play along, work would move to the most productive areas. Workers would be fired and leave low productive areas and move to where the work is.

Ultimately this should lead to some highly populated areas in the world while the rest is empty.

Jesus is the son of God, not of Joseph. Of course he is white.

Edit: \s

Hypothetically, if this comic book copy of the Nazis would be just an act, what could be the benefit?

Since most people don’t listen, and there are still a lot who know, why not join forces? Unlike Cassandra, there is no need to just wait for fate to happen.

That website is batshit

So it is on point?

Would you allow others to join you in your corner in the world and create a team Cassandra?

It should be easier to form a new team than to change existing teams. Once the new team lives a happy life, the other teams will want to copy it. Without that proof, people prefer to stick to the known misery they can control instead of trying something new.

Yes, because that was the original framing. I guess the West did their own annexing, or OP would have kept the focus on those annexations.

What are the failed Russian annexations?

China did Tibet and tried Vietnam, as far as I know, as well as some Indian disputes. I was wondering if there are more because depending on the country, there were reasons enough for the annexations that an alignment with China was not unreasonable. BRICS shows that those annexations are not show stoppers.

Sure, but that doesn’t recreate the power and wealth they have in the US. Why should they support Trump if all they get is a reason to leave the USA?

When you start hiring less intelligent people who can’t help but actually believe the propaganda.

Change doesn’t come from one person having an idea but from the population picking up an idea. Whatever you support has a bigger chance of improving the world.

My comment was a reply to this argument:

After the wars, the US sought soft power, not territory. Aligning with them was often a more safe move.

Seems like Russia also didn’t grab new land after the wars.

In regard to the downvote, which conquered land have I overlooked? The argument is speaking of the past where the war in Ukrain didn’t exist.

Who but common people can effect this change? The elite won’t change anything.

Instead of shooting oneself, why not take a shot at making the world a better place?

There are already three people in this thread who are waiting to die because they don’t like this world. That could be the foundation of a group that turns the world into a better place. They don’t have a use for their mind and body so they are free to dedicate them to a good cause.

Which were the Chinese and Russian 20th century post world war land grabs?

Or they have and just pretend not to know.

Why is samba better?

Don’t mention the empires and the economic advantages.

there has not in human history been a larger industrially organized murder of a people.

In a period of just 100 days 1,47 million jews were systematically targeted and exterminated. That’s nearly double the rate of the Rwandan genocide.

If you put it like that Rwanda’s manual genocide sounds evilly impressive.

Technocracy would be fine. However it seems more like crazy racist incompetence. Even if they are trembling in fear, why do they not stand up?