snooggums

Unless I think having the signal on would confuse other drivers, yes.

Using a signal in some multilane turn only lanes would make it unclear if I was merging into the next lane or using the current lane to turn, so I don’t use it too early if it seems like it would be confusing. I do turn it on close to the intersection to indicate that I know that it is a turn lane.

I also don’t use it for exit only lanes if there is a long lane to get there. If it is short like a turn lane then I do to make it clear know it is an exit/turn.

No rush, I assume they are dead.

I love hearing that there is a singular American accent when every place I visit in the US has a different accent, some of which are a struggle to understand.

Any country has a massive number of accents, especially the larger and more populated they are.

The big thing here is that ‘polite’ words are being singled out as extraneous when there are tons of extraneous words being used. The focus is on words that make it seem like AI has feelings or intent.

There is no reason to filter any words, because the entire point of LLMs is to take inefficient human communication and do stuff with it. ‘Please’ isn’t any more of a waste that ‘the’ or including a period at the end of a sentence.

Not to mention the fact that the whole thing is so horribly inefficient that ‘extra’ words cost millions of dollars to process. Holy shit that is terrible design.

No, we should not.

Smoking was known to be bad for your health long before anyone did studies because it was easily correlated with coughing and other breathing issues and early death. The evidence was obvious and apparent.

You have been tagged as weak willed and fit for the worst types of labor because robots don’t have feelings.

Maybe don’t write an article speculating about something possible being true based on another article that is also speculating about something being possible when it being able to confirm it is possible. Like speculating about dinosaurs makes sense as we don’t have a way to verify their soft tissues. But when it comes to AI, there are ways to actually confirm the reliability of responses.

I’m smart enough to know that an article peppered with assumption and zero facts is dogshit.

Presumably

might

could

Doesn’t matter how educated someone is when they write a bunch of words about possibilities with no actual evidence. They are morons because they are spouting a bunch of useless speculation about a shitty and unreliable technology and naval gazing about whether ‘being polite’ to a bullshit generator is beneficial. I feel dumber for having read both the article and the linked article.

It FEEEEEEEEEEEELS better is what the authors said too. Both articles were completely worthless dreck about how they felt about the responses.

Both authors state that the phrasing from the AI is what is improved based on how they felt about the answers, not the accuracy.

I hate reality shows but would totally watch one season of that.

The author and the writer they quoted are fucking morons.

Tim Discord

We already know they knowingly lied about battery range, the capabilities of self driving, and a ton of other fraudulent practices. Tesla is doing it intentionally is more likely than poor build quality.

I find the variation to be pretty common with all the branded socks so I just get the ones with bold colors that will be easy to sort. Even when I go all white or black I toss the old ones when I get a new package because there is nothing worse than being slightly different styles or one new and the other worn in.

Mismatched feel is even worse than mismatched colors!

The two on the right just look faded and worn. Are you saying all three are new?

That is clearly not seafood!

You can violate copyright law by copying and sharing, but that is different than stealing. Stealing involves taking something. Copyright involves copying.

It is right there in the name.

69gag