• schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What’s your definition of communist? For me it implies a centrally planned economy to the exclusion of any free market and is definitely at great risk to fall into autocracy. I think that kind of project is doomed from the start, so I wouldn’t call identify myself as a communist.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Those are leninist/Maoist. If we’re being generous we could call them aspirationally communist. But not actually communist.

      2 defining criteria for communism is being stateless. Ie not having an governing state elected or otherwise. Definitely not having a large hierarchical unanswerable centralized government. And the other being classlessness. Something that the large central politburos preclude.

      The one thing Leninism shares in the most asinine and negative way with communism. In the actual vision of communism, Marx and others theorized that the workers of the factory, etc. Should own the factory. Social ownership. However, Leninism warps and twists it negatively in that the state owns everything, not the workers. They may claim that the workers are the state. But that’s bullshit as can easily be seen by any time they put down a citizen revolt. Roll out the tanks, etc. Like Tiananmen Square.