• commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I play PC because my copy of StarCraft from like 2000 still works and I can use any computer/gaming peripheral in history that still physically works to this day on a PC. A PC is more compatible with PS4 peripherals/gamepads than a PS5. Plus not paying for the privilege to play multiplayer games that a developer is hosting in AWS

    The experience being so similar between a PC and a console is more an indictment on locked down PCs as consoles than against PC. E-waste

    • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      My PC is so backwards compatible it can run games meant for OS’s my OS’s main competitor, and their ancestors as well.

      Better yet it can literally run those OS’s over things like KVM/Qemu and DOSBox.

      I guess Nintendo made that Wii container for Wii U like once lol.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      You can also upgrade it part by part, and not have to let the entire thing get replaced every cycle.

    • setsubyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      To be fair, connecting some of the hardware I used in the 80ies is not straight-forward. But not impossible.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    We’d get a pretty good game format OS—if the players could agree to come together—and then licence that out. Just like we do with Blu-ray, just like we do with the compact disk—and let people compete on content.

    I know this is the most Lemmy comment it’s possible to make, but oh, if only there were an OS that already exists that you could run games on and that didn’t even need licencing out!