• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    opposes escalation with nuclear superpowers

    Violating an agreement guaranteeing Ukraine’s borders? Totally fine. Providing support in accordance with that agreement? A step too far, that’s escalation!

    Next tell me how evil nato forced putin to invade Ukraine to prevent nato expansion. And then how two new countries joining nato counts as preventing nato expansion.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Which is it? Should the Minsk agreements have been followed or not? Because every action you’re describing by the west is a violation of the agreements. Zelenskyy ran on neutrality, and respecting agreements made with Russia, then reversed course once elected, and now refuses to hold elections and risk the people electing a real neutral candidate.

      You have a complete misunderstanding of the basic facts in this conflict: https://savageminds.substack.com/p/save-ukraine-from-american-meddling

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        The Budapest memorandum. You know, the entire reason Ukraine handed over their nukes? Minsk happened after Russia already violated that. Ukraine should’ve had an entire US arsenal the second Russian troops stepped foot in Ukraine.

        And it’s well documented that Russian regulars were there, so don’t bother with the separatist stuff.