• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That is basically Schrodinger’s cat

    No, it’s not.

    Schrödinger’s cat thought experiment is about things where observing state will impact the state. That would maybe apply if we’re talking about something unique, like an ungraded collectible or one of a kind item (maybe Trump’s beard clippings?) where it cannot have a value until it is either graded or sold.

    Stocks have real-time valuations, and trades can happen in near real time. There’s no box for the cat to be in, it’s always observable.

    money

    Look up the definition. Here’s the second usage from Webster:

    2 a: wealth reckoned in terms of money

    And the legal definition, further down on the same page:

    2 a: assets or compensation in the form of or readily convertible into cash

    Stocks are absolutely readily convertible to cash, and I argue that less liquid investments like RE are as well (esp with those cash offer places). Basically, if there’s a market price for it and you can reasonably get that price, it counts.

    When my stocks go down, I may not have realized that loss yet from a tax perspective, but the amount of money I can readily convert to cash is reduced.