• PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If you can be in three meetings at once with AI then every single one of those meetings could have been an email

    Or a group chat

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s meetings other people need to have and I just need to know broadly what was said. Transcription and summerizing would be great for that

      That is, if I could trust its accuracy. Which I don’t.

      • 123@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So a followup email with meeting minutes written by someone actually there…

        • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The skills of both writing useful minutes and prioritizing actually sending them out are frustratingly rare. An average meeting with five or six people has even odds of not including someone with both of those skills. I can see where reliably having a mediocre AI summary might be an advantage over sometimes having superb human-written minutes and sometimes having nothing.