Disapproval rose to 62%, the worst of his two terms in office, amid economic issues since launching his war against Iran

Six months out from November’s midterm US elections, Donald Trump’s disapproval rating has reached 62% – the worst of his two terms in office – according to a new Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll.

The US president received his worst ratings on the cost of living and other economic issues since launching his deeply unpopular war against Iran in February, which has plunged the global economy into an oil crisis and sent gas prices rocketing to a four-year high.

Trump achieved majority disapproval on his management of every issue measured, including Americans disapproved of his handling of that war by 66% to 32%, while a staggering 76% disapproved and only 23% approved of his handling of the cost of living. Two-thirds of Americans now feel the country is headed in the wrong direction.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s obvious that disapproval ratings mean nothing yet the media machine constantly spits that up. I guess it makes all of us anti-trump folk feel a bit better while the brazen pedophile stumbles ever upward.

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It does. It reflects the general population’s approval and therefore affects the decision making of politicians looking for reelection.

      • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I totally agree, if what is being reported is true. Is it a small group of spin doctors or the general population?

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I don’t know how it is done on the US, but it’ll always be samples, of course. Which does not make it a useless result at all, statistics on a population sample can be true for the full population if the sample is well done.

          Typically polling agencies will not pick people at random to answer their questions. There is always criteria they respect to have a valid sample. It is of course not an exact science, but done properly and transparently (that’s where I don’t know if the US does it right) it is very powerful.