• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    30 hour workweek should have been 40 or 50 years ago. 30 would be late. We should be moving down to 20 about now.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think you mean “we should be fighting hard for a 20 hour work week now, as hard as our ancestors fought for an 8 hour work day, and we should be willing to die for the cause, the way they died for theirs.”

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It should not even take that much. A big issue was unions somewhere in the 80’s or even in the 70’s stopped looking to shorten hours in favor of increased wages with overtime. The membership were easily swayed by time and a half. This lead to the reversal of the 40 hour week. More than 40 became more normal than 40. Of course then over time they have gotten rid of access to time and a half and more defining of roles as exempt.