• Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This is an extremely ignorant take.

    A think-tank is supposed to inform, but an informed decision can only be made if the person making the decision is fully informed.

    First of all - we don’t know if the think-tank said ONLY that. Maybe it was one ten different things they reported.

    Second of all - what was the context of the report? Was it “what do we need to do to ensure that age verification is fool proof?” Or was it “IF we introduce age verification, what are some of the pitfalls we can encounter?”

    Stop panicking. The EU operates on democratic principles, and everybody knows well in advance about any votes happening.

    EDIT: just read the abstract of the report - yeah, it’s a nothingburger. “VPN can be used to bypass age verification” is what it says. Which is a statement of fact. Sure, the language of their tweet is shifty (with a strong push to introducing AV), but who cares? The idea was shot down a couple of times already, and it will be shot down again unless a solution is found that guarantees privacy of users.