The Trump administration is also warning all 50 states that it could freeze funding for their Medicaid fraud units unless they investigate and prosecute fraud by providers.
If you’re gonna compare modern cars and emission systems to cars from 50 years ago that were straight piped and barely had catalytic converter then sure go ahead.
I just don’t happen to agree with police officers harassment of car enthusiasts. But I mean enforcing emission laws that are disproportionally enforced is clearly more important than peoples rights getting abused for bullshit reasons by the government.
Burning fossil fuels kills more than 250,000 people a year in the US, the majority source being automobiles. Savings lives is a bullshit reason in your world I guess.
While I agree that a significant portion of emissions comes from individual car use, The greater majority of air pollution comes from industrial and business uses.
I think the implementation that California has towards oppressive air pollution and vehicle emission laws for citizens while letting corporations pollute as much as they want is the real problem.
I’m not saying that there should be no emission laws, I’m simply pointing out the California police officers have a reputation for targeting citizens as opposed to corporations.
If we’re going to look at total global emissions then something like 40% of carbon emissions come from the shipping industry. So the focus should be on Changing over shipping containers to electric as opposed to fuel oil. Tell me what are the admission standards for international shipping?
Stop moving goalposts. Yes, industrial and shipping pollution are significant and need better laws and regulations. It’s intellectually lazy to claim because another aspect isn’t regulated that the topic of discussion becomes less important.
Oh I don’t know maybe start by going after the businesses and writing rather registration that’s targeted towards corporations rather than individual citizens.
If you’re gonna compare modern cars and emission systems to cars from 50 years ago that were straight piped and barely had catalytic converter then sure go ahead.
because of bullshit emissions laws. you think all that was voluntary?
This. Use the collected taxes to actually improve infrastructure and create a CA universal healthcare system. Pour that money into education instead.
And stop infringing on people’s freedoms with stupid environmental bullshit.
Breathable air…bullshit.
Go back to LA smog days.
If you’re gonna compare modern cars and emission systems to cars from 50 years ago that were straight piped and barely had catalytic converter then sure go ahead.
I just don’t happen to agree with police officers harassment of car enthusiasts. But I mean enforcing emission laws that are disproportionally enforced is clearly more important than peoples rights getting abused for bullshit reasons by the government.
How’s that boot fucking taste?
Burning fossil fuels kills more than 250,000 people a year in the US, the majority source being automobiles. Savings lives is a bullshit reason in your world I guess.
While I agree that a significant portion of emissions comes from individual car use, The greater majority of air pollution comes from industrial and business uses.
I think the implementation that California has towards oppressive air pollution and vehicle emission laws for citizens while letting corporations pollute as much as they want is the real problem.
I’m not saying that there should be no emission laws, I’m simply pointing out the California police officers have a reputation for targeting citizens as opposed to corporations.
If we’re going to look at total global emissions then something like 40% of carbon emissions come from the shipping industry. So the focus should be on Changing over shipping containers to electric as opposed to fuel oil. Tell me what are the admission standards for international shipping?
https://news.mit.edu/2013/study-air-pollution-causes-200000-early-deaths-each-year-in-the-us-0829
Stop moving goalposts. Yes, industrial and shipping pollution are significant and need better laws and regulations. It’s intellectually lazy to claim because another aspect isn’t regulated that the topic of discussion becomes less important.
And how do you think to combat the emissions of industry and other buisnesses if not with enviormental protection legislation?
Oh I don’t know maybe start by going after the businesses and writing rather registration that’s targeted towards corporations rather than individual citizens.
because of bullshit emissions laws. you think all that was voluntary?