Just knowing a way to break his mind can be so simple is good to know.
Tbh it seems like a very flattering depiction of him?
Like, no jowls, no mouth-eyes.
What’s his issue with it?
Because it isn’t his ‘brand’ image…it’s not him visually and doesn’t make him look like the sack of shit he wants to be portrayed as
This is his brand of image:
“Sinister” is the word you’re looking for.
And if this seems vaguely familiar, here’s why:
Dictators, fictional and real alike, love sinister portraits of themselves.
Another reason it might seem familiar…
I mean its bad, but it doesnt look intentionally mocking. Only piss babies would care. I wouldnt even care if someone drew me as the devil with a dick in each hand, hell yeah man art it up.
The correct response is to do as he asks… Respectfully remove the painting.
Then replace it with a picture of an orange baby and put his name on the plaque.
The actual backstory on this (referenced in the article) is even more absurd.
That spot which is supposed to have Trump’s picture was empty for quite a while because they were having trouble raising money for it. But then someone smuggled in a literal picture of Putin and hung it in its place. Colorado Republicans had no trouble raising the money after that.
