• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    PWA isn’t as bad as electron but it’s similar. No local storage or offline capability - which is fine for a weather app, but not fine for something with persistent data like email or chat or a word processor. My computer has loaded up an entire GUI, with local storage and RAM, make use of it in an intelligent way instead of just loading a browser instance and assuming I don’t mind latency.

    PWA is 100% better than an “App” that’s just a data collection unit showing the website. Which is all too common too.

    • Zagorath@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      No local storage or offline capability

      PWAs can do both of these. In fact, the definition of a PWA includes that it has some functionality offline. (Though this criteria can be met by serving a simple “sorry, you’re offline right now” page. So long as it isn’t the browser’s default “no connection” error.)

    • chris@links.openriver.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay I think I get it. Yeah the PWA I save are usually websites I frequent but don’t want to install their app.