mystic-macaroni@lemmy.ml to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 17 days agoDo creatives maintain relevance because lay people can't edit AI generated works?message-squaremessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down18
arrow-up15arrow-down1message-squareDo creatives maintain relevance because lay people can't edit AI generated works?mystic-macaroni@lemmy.ml to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 17 days agomessage-square18linkfedilink
minus-squareRoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·17 days agoThey maintain relevance because art is a human experience and robots have no home within it.
minus-squaremystic-macaroni@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 days agoMy question comes from anyone can make a thing with ai, but is that “good enough” to that “creator” or will traditional artists still have a role becaude it isn’t
minus-squareRoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·17 days agoYou find me an objective standard of “good enough” that we can all agree on and I’ll find you bigfoot.
They maintain relevance because art is a human experience and robots have no home within it.
My question comes from anyone can make a thing with ai, but is that “good enough” to that “creator” or will traditional artists still have a role becaude it isn’t
You find me an objective standard of “good enough” that we can all agree on and I’ll find you bigfoot.