• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, and anti-communists tend to overlook the shitty things Capitalism and the US government do.

    The critique cuts both ways. I don’t think either side has much of a solution… But right now - in the west - it’s clear that too much Socialism is not the problem.

    The West is Cappoed out right now. Kind of tired of it.

    Hey kid, wanna buy us a new Data Center?

    No thanks Sir, please leave me alone.

    • copingwithelmons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      anti-communists tend to overlook the shitty things Capitalism and the US government do

      I don’t think either side has much of a solution

      You are conflating not being a tankie with being an anticommunist.

      Being a communist shouldn’t stop you from ciritquing your own state. A healthy communist state allows for open critique and discussion of what works and what doesn’t. Otherwise you risk autocracy.

      And I would hazard calling China and Russia communist states. Russia doesn’t even call itself communist anymore. And China is a one party autocracy with a free market. They’re only communists in name.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What’s your definition of communist? For me it implies a centrally planned economy to the exclusion of any free market and is definitely at great risk to fall into autocracy. I think that kind of project is doomed from the start, so I wouldn’t call identify myself as a communist.

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Those are leninist/Maoist. If we’re being generous we could call them aspirationally communist. But not actually communist.

          2 defining criteria for communism is being stateless. Ie not having an governing state elected or otherwise. Definitely not having a large hierarchical unanswerable centralized government. And the other being classlessness. Something that the large central politburos preclude.

          The one thing Leninism shares in the most asinine and negative way with communism. In the actual vision of communism, Marx and others theorized that the workers of the factory, etc. Should own the factory. Social ownership. However, Leninism warps and twists it negatively in that the state owns everything, not the workers. They may claim that the workers are the state. But that’s bullshit as can easily be seen by any time they put down a citizen revolt. Roll out the tanks, etc. Like Tiananmen Square.