Adrian Basar did not want to become a distant-water fisherman. With 22-hour workdays and pay of around 450 dollars per month, it’s not the most glamorous—or fulfilling, or generally safe—job.

But for 10 months out of the year, when he’s out at sea, Basar can’t talk to his siblings, or anyone in his family, because he’s not allowed to use the Wi-Fi on the ship.

“I think the companies that don’t want to put Wi-Fi on their ships pray for things not to be revealed,” Basar said. “There are many companies that don’t want Wi-Fi.”

A coalition between a self-organized Indonesian fishers’ union, a Taiwanese human rights group and multiple global labor organizations is trying to change that.

The “Wi-Fi Now for Fishers’ Rights” campaign, which has been organizing since 2023, wants to make Wi-Fi access a standard in the industry, both to help improve working conditions through union organizing and to allow the workers to have contact with other human beings for more than two months per year.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    They should be asking for internet access rather than “WiFi”, as WiFi is not synonymous with internet access

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      if language changes like that then the problem is that while what they want is clear, what they might get is just a WiFi router in the boat so they can have WiFi but no internet.

      also, expecting everyone to be technologically literate is just plain stupid, especially in poorer countries.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      To normies of course it is, they don’t even know what the innernette is, they know WiFi though. I’ve even seen people call their cellular signal “phone WiFi” or “5G WiFi” and refer to a Cat5 Ethernet cable as a “WiFi cable”.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      On one hand, yes. On the other hand, on a cell phone on a boat in the middle of nowhere with no congestion in the airwaves, it’s probably by far the most practical.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      “Here’s your WiFi. Oh, you want the password? Next you’ll be asking for DHCP.”

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I really don’t want to be a hater on this, but maybe get a different vocation?

    If you need remote access to Internet, Starlink IS an option if you want to give that prick money.

    There are also other Sat alternatives as well. This is mostly a solved problem.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      “Get a different job” doesn’t apply when it’s stuff that everyone would want, like being able to call their family. The next person will just ask for the same thing.

      Imagine installing your own satellite dish at work.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So, if you’re working 22 hour days for $450 a month, you’re not really in a position to decide what equipment gets installed on the boat. There’s a lot of things that are technically possible but not done because it doesn’t serve company greed.