• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Elissa Slotkin can fuck off.

    Detailing her plan, Slotkin – a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency…

    Oh, she can really fuck off.

    Edit:

    “I can’t do what she does because we live in a purple state, and I’m a pragmatist,” she concluded.

    This is code for not rocking the boat.

  • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    First part of article title is a bit misleading I think. She thinks “Kings” is a better term than oligarchy because it’s more relatable. She has a plan to fight kings. She does seem to think wokeness is weak though.

    Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) has urged her Democratic colleagues to stop attacking the “oligarchy” on Thursday, arguing that the word did not resonate with most Americans and should be replaced with “kings.”

    Detailing her plan, Slotkin – a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) – argued that the Democratic Party needed to lose its “weak and woke” reputation and “fucking retake the flag,” adopting a “goddamn Alpha energy” inspired by Detroit Lions coach Dan Campbell.

    “She said Democrats should stop using the term ‘oligarchy,’ a phrase she said doesn’t resonate beyond coastal institutions, and just say that the party opposes ‘kings,'” wrote Wren, who reported that Slotkin was planning to deliver a series of speeches in the coming months about her plan.

  • SpaceShort@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Democratic Party is so full of collaborationists. Just shows how democracy and capitalism are incompatible. The bourgeois class just buy the politicians.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Of course. They don’t want to fix things, they just want to be the ones getting the benefits.

  • Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    She’s sorta right. ‘Oligarchy’ is a big college word that Joe Bumblefuck doesn’t understand.

    Aristocrats is a good word, but again: “duh?”

    Therefore Dems just need to start harping about “rich fucking parasites”

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yep, this is a branding issue.

      Oligarchy => “rich fucking parasites”

      Woke = equality (equity too, but stick with equality for sake of simplicity)

    • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      People are clued in on oligarchy even if they don’t quite know the exact definition. After Bernie and AOC started their tour, it was Wikipedia top 5 articles. Slotkin is just a right wing traitor.

    • kipo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yep. She’s talking about changing optics and messaging to something that resonates with the larger ‘I know very little about politics but I still vote’ group of voters.

      The headline feels like clickbait.

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fighting Oligarchy resonates greatly. But yes, the dems have focused too much on the culture war in favour of participating in the class war against the working class.

    That is definitely something they should put waaaay more focus on. Trump is the cry for help of much of the working class, if people would believe you actually fought FOR the working people in your country, the dems would be unstoppable.

    • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So sad that people are still trying to fix this shitparty that is working perfectly as they intended.
      But americans are incapable of change and voting for 3rd party apparently.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      But yes, the dems have focused too much on the culture war

      No, republicans focus on the culture war. democrats are playing defense. Well, if you call forfeiting “playing defense.”

  • Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The unfalsifiable orthodoxy. Moving to the far-right and appealing to moderate Republicans win elections. If a Democrat wins, it proves that this works, if a Democrat loses, they just hadn’t moved far-right enough.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. When the ‘resistance’ grand plans are to adopt the fascist framing (e.g. that ‘woke is weak’ and should be surrendered) what’s the point in having an opposition party?

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        what’s the point in having an opposition party?

        To co-opt and prevent real opposition.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re winning because of exactly what she said. There’s an issue of perception that people on the left will never fully grasp.

      You all have no idea to engage online or publicly in a way that comes off as appealing.

    • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately shes in the right party for this BS. This is what the Dems have been for decades. We need a new party, not a new democrat.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We need a Guillotine Party, to do for the Democratic party what the Tea Party did for the GOP: Take it over from the inside out.

          • pecklepuff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, but it worked. It got lots of people who felt very small and very threatened and who were/are envious of successful, educated “libs” to rally around populist candidates who didn’t want to make everyone’s lives better, but instead just make everyone else as miserable as the Tea Party followers.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Exactly. The current GOP looks more like the Tea Party than it does the pre-tea-party GOP. They managed to effect change within the party.