• Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Many companies like websites, tv, radio, etc. depend on the revenues from advertisers to pay their workers and expenses. If they didn’t have that, everything would likely turn to susbscription or a regular pleading for money so they could continue.

    • itrealgood@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If companies need advertisements to inform potential customers, let them do that in an appropriate place. For instance, an adds booklet.
      Allowing companies to use the public space to advertise is not in the interest of the populace: it stimulates overconsumption and it creates distracting stimuli in an environment that is already very busy. It also facilitates unfair competition when advertising space is sold to the highest bidder, since company wealth supersedes product quality or utility.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      cool, so they should still ban ads entirely. it’s a waste

      while their at it, also ban a lot of the bullshit they put on products too… zero sugar you claim? why is number 3 on the ingredient list… sugar? ohhh that’s right, you manipulated the serving size so math stoically there’s 0% sugar… but it’s a lie so ya know…