• Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There are already some nationwide restrictions on ads for alcohol, though not (yet) a complete ban.

      I guess it wasn’t part of this specific initiative, since it was aimed at carbon-polluting industries, whereas alcohol is a different type of problem.

      • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Many companies like websites, tv, radio, etc. depend on the revenues from advertisers to pay their workers and expenses. If they didn’t have that, everything would likely turn to susbscription or a regular pleading for money so they could continue.

        • itrealgood@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If companies need advertisements to inform potential customers, let them do that in an appropriate place. For instance, an adds booklet.
          Allowing companies to use the public space to advertise is not in the interest of the populace: it stimulates overconsumption and it creates distracting stimuli in an environment that is already very busy. It also facilitates unfair competition when advertising space is sold to the highest bidder, since company wealth supersedes product quality or utility.

        • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          cool, so they should still ban ads entirely. it’s a waste

          while their at it, also ban a lot of the bullshit they put on products too… zero sugar you claim? why is number 3 on the ingredient list… sugar? ohhh that’s right, you manipulated the serving size so math stoically there’s 0% sugar… but it’s a lie so ya know…