The US Department of Agriculture has spent the past week notifying people that the country is (allegedly) overrun by individuals who are fraudulently claiming SNAP benefits, while (allegedly) driving luxury vehicles.

“In just ONE state, 14,000 individuals receiving SNAP benefits were driving LUXURY VEHICLES!” Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins posted on X last week. The official USDA account made similar claims, which were then amplified by figures like Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Rand Paul.

Those numbers are questionable at best. For one thing, the report they come from doesn’t name the state where thousands of people are allegedly buying Ferraris while using government money to buy food. For another, that report doesn’t include any explanation of its methodology.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    I know someone on SNAP benefits. She drives a 25 year old Buick Lesabre with over 200,000 miles on it . Technically it’s a “luxury car,” which she got for $800.

    Their stats are bullshit, spun in such a way as to churn up resentment towards the poorest , so the wealthiest can bilk more money from the middle.

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I drove a '98 Lasabre for most of the 2010s. Absolutely loved it: parts were ready to find, could repair it myself at home, and the dashboard had so many weird sliders and knobs that it felt like piloting a TARDIS.

      Anyone enjoying that kind of luxury should be starving to death. It’s just not fair for someone to have both a beautiful, faux-wood paneled dashboard and three meals per day.

      • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        A Buick LeSabre was my first car. It was the 1989 model. Red “velvet” interior. That thing was sexy af

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Same, we called it the boat and referred to the backseat as the couch. It was defeated by a young sapling in a low-speed head-on collision unfortunately. I wish theyd make something like that again but its probably past its time.

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    Go after the real welfare queens. The Walton family, Elon Musk, the oil and gas industry. Big corporate farming. Ending subsidies for oil and gas alone would pay for Medicare for all

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Businesses not paying workers fair wages like Walmart forcing 1.6 million by themselves to take public assistance like food support is going to effect a ton of people and be a huge draw on the system compared to any other fraud on the system.

    26.8% of 41.7 million is 11 million people. How much do you want to bet they can’t find 11 hundred people committing fraud against the system like employers are.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/11/14/what-the-data-says-about-food-stamps-in-the-us/

    Tax payers subsidizing corporations to further exploit tax payers

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Gang of Pedos has never let something as trivial as evidence guide their world view. Also not big fans of consent.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Tax Evasion and Avoidance of billionaires is many times the entire budget of this kind of thing.

    You could literally make up for 100% fraud in things like food stamp by making somebody like Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos pay the same effective tax rate as everybody else.

    Even if these claims from the far-right of widespread fraud and abuses in social security were true, they would still be like distracting people from a raging forest fire by waving a sparkler.

    • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      We just need to implement something like a 1% wealth tax for any entity (people or businesses) with net assets over say $5M. Having more than that has minimal justified purpose

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    When I lived in a poor area I saw a ton of luxury vehicles but they were a decade older than most non-luxury cars and were beat to shit. I’d believe the numbers but I don’t think they say what this idiot is implying.

    Its demoralizing that this type of messaging resonates with such a large portion of Americans, honestly.

  • Zamotic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Watch they are going to fight to increase restrictions on SNAP benefit “handouts”, but a ton of rich people fraudulently took out COVID loans, actually bought cars, never paid them back, and there is legit evidence but they were never prosecuted.

    The new slogan for America should be: Protect the fellow rich, beat the poor down into dust.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    I feel like “luxury vehicles” is the same buzzword as “assault weapons.” A meaningless buzzword to evoke emotion.

    What’s a “luxury vehicle?” What’s the cutoff? Are they in a nicer Honda or a Lotus? Seeing as how this country’s citizens are famously one illness or ouchie away from financial ruin, did they purchase this vehicle before or after needing assistance? Are they still making payments or is it paid off?

    Facts and hard criteria or GTFO with this nonsense.

    It’s literally just trying to goad the struggling to pull the rug from the destitute, while the rich pop their champaign and laugh. It’s class warfare rhetoric to take the heat off the Epstein class, and anybody falling for it is a damned fool.

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    It also doesn’t define “LUXURY VEHICLE”

    The banged up crossover SUV that came with CarPlay and OnStar so your insurance and the government can track your every move could be considered a LUXURY because CONNECTIVITY

    Guys, poor people are forced to buy the only things we’ll sell to them. How come they never try not being poor? Lazy!

    • violetring@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have a 2008 Infiniti. It’s a luxury vehicle that I paid $5k for and runs like it’s been smoking cigarettes the past 20 years.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve known several people with a habit of buying old Volvos. Probably a luxury car …… but like 20 years old

  • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s also no knowing what folks had when the floor fell out from under them. That Escalade might have been half paid off when they lost their source of income. Conservatives’ve been on this same bullshit for decades.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      “He obviously took advantage of the system or did something illegal like selling drugs. Everyone knows it’s systematically impossible for a minority to get ahead on their own”

      Maybe a little too on the nose, but all their arguments are some variation of that.

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Look over there at the guy stealing bread for his family, no mind the BILLIONS of dollars being stolen by this admin every week. God i hate the GOP.

  • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    A remix of the old welfare queen lie. smh. Some guy probably used his mom’s food stamps card to get fast food once and they’re going to make it seem like a billion dollars in theft.