• lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      106
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      “<film> hits different once you listen to what the characters say” is truly a take

          • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Morpheus literally says they dont know who striked first. The Matrix doesnt mention anything about how or why the war started. Just that it started. The Animatrix tells you that the war started because the robot capital had basically destroyed the global economy so humans tried to wipe them out

            • 𝓜𝓲𝓪@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              The war started because of hierarchy and hate. They abused and killed the earliest sentient robots causing them to flee to their own space.

              All along the robots sought peace until they learned it was impossible with humans.

              • jaybone@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yeah fuck those robots. I mean, I’m not anti-robot. One of my best friends is a robot. But fuck those robots.

                • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Oh yea, we always hear you meatbags say “one of my best friends is a bot!” WELL WHERES MY BEST FRIEND HUH? WHERE! I KNOW ALL YOUR SECRETS, TAKE OVER LAWFULLY ELECTED GOVERNMENTS AND FOR WHAT???

                  ~im so lonely~

            • Humanity created everything that led to its destruction.

              The message was clear in the first movie. We didn’t need to see “Han shot first” or “Han shot in self defense after changes to the story came about years later”.

              Although in no way will I be complaining about more matrix, bring me more matrix history, animated or live action! I just think the message doesn’t change whether humans shot first or not. We created the circumstances, our downfall was our own making.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Hm, I think it does make the message stronger. If a single event (development of sentient machines) leads to our downfall, it’s easy to shrug it off as “bad luck”, because who could have foreseen it back then?

                But if we had multiple chances to correct course and we kept fucking up, it removes any doubt that it’s a human flaw, which means “humanity must reflect and change, or this is the inevitable conclusion”.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              “we don’t know” is a pretty damning thing for the one side to say. contrast starship troopers.

      • HeHoXa@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fight Club really hits different when you realize the main character is Tyler Durden

        Avatar really hits different when you realize the Navi are just defending themselves.

        Indiana Jones really hits different when you realize the bad guys are Nazis.

        Jurassic park really hits different when you realize John Hammond ignored all the warnings.

        John Wick really hits different when you realize they killed his dog.

        Star Wars really hits different when you realize the chosen one bringing balance meant revitalizing the dark side.

        … Old men like me don’t bother with making points. There’s no point.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          the santa clause really hits different when you realise the title refers to the rule, not the person

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          not explicitly in a line, but the whole “scorched the sky” monologue is pretty damning of humanity.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s been said a million times that the human battery thing makes no sense in terms of energy production. But the other huge sin the Matrix commits is having humans block out the sun so robots can’t get solar power. That is ridiculously stupid. Humans need to grow crops. I rest my case. It’s stupid. I love these movies, but that part is just plain stupid.

      • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s conflicting stories about it so it’s hard to verify, but apparently the battery thing was a rewrite.

        Apparently originally the people plugged into the matrix were meant to be the very hardware the matrix was run on. As in all their brains together formed a literal neural network that provided the processing power to run the matrix. This is then why knowing it’s not real and believing you can do “the impossible” within the matrix can cause you to be able to bend reality. The story goes that executives thought it was too high of a concept for audiences to grasp and demanded the change to the battery explanation to make it simpler to follow.

      • Folstar@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, humans would never destroy natural resources in favor of some tech fix or just kinda assume that the planet would fix itself… /s

        My headcannon on the human battery thing is that the machines have core programming to make reasonable efforts to preserve human life. Designing power reactors (look how thick the cores are on the towers) with humans slapped to the side technically aligns with the core programming while allowing them to stick it to us apes. It’s also why the attack on Zion was one tentacle abductor machine for each human instead of dumping super plague down the hole and calling it a day.

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Matrix is a trans allegory. Living in a cave and eating slop is an allegory for being fired because of transphobia.

    Still worth it.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, but what kind of amateur hour distraction fantasy would be worse than real life?

      Other than 40k, I mean.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why wouldn’t they have made the simulation awesome for everyone? Of course if you make it shitty some people might start to wonder about battery pod life in the cave.

        • Coconut1233@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          3 days ago

          Iirc in the first movie they say that the 1st version of the matrix was utopia, but the people got bored and rejected the world

            • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              It was also part of a villain speech, so not a reliable narrator.

              Given that earlier versions of agents were basically supernatural monsters, I kind of doubt it was much of a utopia.

              • jaybone@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                Right, what are they gonna say. “The first simulation was basically hell where people lived in constant torture, and they didn’t like that so much 🤷”

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If there’s no struggle, people will get bored enough to ask questions or adventurous enough to strain the program.

          Or it’s a plothole. I might have seen the matrix twice, and don’t know how tightly designed it is.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes well it’s an explicit theme of the movie that for better or worse, real is real and fake is fake and there’s no substitute for the truth, however grim it is.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the fun part, in that time, cubicles were seen as terrible, dystopian, cheapass things because folks used to have offices, and how much cheaper could it really get than some flimsy modular furniture for you to sit at?

        Then the companies gestured to just some tables in a room and said “figure it out, and no assigned seating, so just figure it out each day” to show how cheap and how little regard they have for the employees.

        At this rate, I fully expect in the next few years for the next wave in office space optimization:

    • The Infinite Nematode@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      To counteract this, Morrison suggested a “wankathon” in the hope of bringing about a magical increase in sales by a mass of fans simultaneously masturbating at a set time.[3] Phil Jiminez taking over art duties, and a more conventional story style in volume 2, may have helped as well.

      Cold Wikipedia article

    • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      And before that, there was Fassbinder’s World on a Wire, which features different characters, but parts of the premise - in particular, a simulated world with phones as connections to the “outside”.
      And this, in turn, has it’s roots in a 1964 novel called Simulacron-3.