• ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 days ago

    Thank you for pointing this out - it looks like someone took the original below and slopped it. WHY?! Why was the original not good enough? We will never know. I shall update the post.

          • ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 days ago

            I won’t either. There is also a trend a take a cute animal pic of an animal doing something, and then replace the type of animal with AI. Let’s say it’s two dogs cuddling in a cute way, and they will regenerate it to be two cats or guinea pigs or whatever. It’s nuts!

            • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              5 days ago

              It’s good that the usage of AI doesn’t cause environmental problems. Imagine we would use it for things like these, and it would be bad for us 😑

    • TheRtRevKaiser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I saw another example of something like this recently. I wonder if somebody used an AI upscale and it slopped it up. The slop version does look larger than the original. I wonder why it replaced the OP name and PFP though…

      Edit: Looking at this some more and boy it’s fucking weird. The numbers of likes/comments/rethreads or whatever the call them are all the same, but the icons are different. The OP is changed, but the username/picture of the reply are the same. Even the icon of the user that liked the reply seems to be the same. I can’t fucking imagine why this was done, lol.