• titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yep. In fact I just met an 80 year old guy today that spent his career repairing tvs. Sure were a lot of tv repair men and shops for tvs that never broke.

    • 007Ace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Remember when the tube started to go and you had to leave it on all the time or whack the side of it when you first turned it on for the day, until it warmed up?

  • Anchorxiety@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    6 days ago

    One advantage of modern TVs is how slim they are. It’s so crazy to me now how much space those old TVs took up. You just had a big TV stand sticking out from the wall.

    • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I repair arcade games and often mention to curious onlookers: “Fifty years of putting miniature particle accelerators in every home and business!”

  • farmgineer@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think that’s some major rose-colored-glasses thinking. They did break. A child with a magnet could also cause issues, at least on older ones (I say having been said child).

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I dropped mine down the stairs, the implosion from the vacuum tube was pretty impressive.

    • CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Circa late 1980s I remember our dad brought home a degauser from work, hey anyone remember what a degauser is? It was a magnetic box (VERY STRONG MAGNETS) with a tunnel to slide a cassette tape through, to erase the cassette tape. Well I don’t remember which of us family members decided its storage place should be on top of the TV but what a fun science lesson that turned out to be 😄 If you moved the magnet around the TV in all different places, the distortion on the screen would follow wherever the magnet was, and IIRC the screen distortion wasn’t permanent. The screen went back to normal when you removed the magnet from the vicinity.

      • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        TVs have their own degaussing coil built-in, it’s the short buzz you hear first when the TV is turned on.

        If the metal frame around the front of the tube becomes strongly magnetized, that’s when the distortion is “permanent”, meaning it’s not permanent but not really feasible to fix.

      • farmgineer@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        IIRC It messes with the beam guides. I’m not sure if there are cases/designs in which it would cause permanent damage in color TVs, but I seem to think I managed to permanently tint our older one green somehow.

      • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        We tried with magnet, no where as strong as the ones you’ve mentioned, but still, it messed up the image. It was fun.

    • rethnor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I had some unshielded noise speakers that would change the color when swiped across the screen in one direction. And cleared it when swiped the other direction. Fun times!

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just in case anybody is stupid enough to believe this, there was nothing radioactive in old CRT-based TVs. And they sometimes had black cases but weren’t a “black box”.

    They worked by bending a beam of electrons that hit phosphors in the screen, which is cool enough that saying stupid BS about “radioactive” is unnecessary.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 days ago

      CRTs can emit X-Rays, but they are properly shielded so they never leave the tube.

      The X-Ray scare mostly came from a line of GE TV’s in 1968 that had improper shielding and had to be recalled.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Radioactivity and X-Rays are tangentially related, but they’re not at all the same thing.

        • Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          One is from a decaying material and the other is from controlled electron beam, but they are both radiation emitters. People are just more familiar with the term radioactive and think it is the catch-all term for a source of radiation.

          The electron gun in a tv and in an xray machine are pretty similar and without shielding, you will still get hit with radiation even if it isn’t strictly radioactive, but rather another type of radiation emitter.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            One is from a decaying material

            Specifically radioactive decay.

            the other is from controlled electron beam

            So, not radioactivity.

            Radiation is a really vague term. It’s just energy moving in the form of waves or particles. Sunlight is radiation. Radio waves are radiation. Microwaves are radiation. Wifi is radiation.

            Radiation can be dangerous in a few ways. Something can be very bright and blind you, or it can cause you to heat up too much. X-rays are an example of ionizing radiation, that’s dangerous because it can break apart molecular bonds, causing damage to cells. That’s why you can get skin cancer from ultraviolet radiation. X-rays are a shorter wavelength than ultraviolet light, so there’s more potential cellular damage per photon.

            But, radioactivity is dangerous not just because of X-rays, but primarily because of alpha and beta particles, and because of even higher energy particles like gamma particles / rays.

            So, just because there’s one type of ionizing radiation that can come from a CRT-TV that is also peripherally associated with radioactive decay doesn’t mean that there’s any connection between a TV and radioactivity.

            That would be like saying that an atomic bomb causes a huge explosion, and a fertilizer bomb also causes a huge explosion, so a fertilizer bomb is a nuke.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      beam of electrons

      Let’s say it cooler: they were particle accelerators you pointed at your face.

      Also, massive glass vacuum bottles that could implode if mishandled.

      And with massive capacitors that could electrocute you if mishandled.

      And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

      And the static electricity felt really neat on the back of your hand if you put it close to the screen.

      They were so fucking cool, and we took them for granted, and now they’re gone, and life is significantly less cool without them.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        But by fuck was their capacity to put out a clear image mid. But their screen size on the other hand …extremely limited

        • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          TVs, maybe¹. CRT monitors, though? They were great. And mostly didn’t care about what resolution you threw at them.

          1. It’s a big maybe, though. Live TV? Sure, but that was more on the extremely low resolution signal than on the screen (HDTV would’ve looked great on a CRT). But games? They were fantastic for games, though. Artists designed their images with CRT’s natural blur on mind, and now we need complex filters and at least a 4K monitor to replicate the original look.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

        Sometimes. Other times they were little portable things.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            1.2 kg isn’t very much, especially for a dense piece of electronics.

            If you look at the history of iMac computers, when they went from CRTs to flat screens they only dropped 6 kg from 15.7 kg to 9.6 kg. Since then they’ve focused on making them lighter and lighter, but it’s not like the CRT was the majority of the weight.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Barium glass.

        Leaded glass was only used for the rear of the tube (or amber monochrome displays), the front glass was barium infused for colour CRTs.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Radioactivity and X-Rays are tangentially related, but they’re not at all the same thing.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s the equivalent of knowing the difference between “poisonous” and “venomous”

          For the vast majority of people it doesn’t matter. Maybe they learned in 8th grade, but they forgot, because it never came back up.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Not really. Radiation is something you encounter every day. Radioactivity is something you probably never encounter. Most people except Australians rarely encounter poisonous and venomous animals.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    the only way to have your privacy protected these days is to be in the epstien files.

  • bimbobear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Spent a few days in an AirBnB with all LGTV’s throughout the house. We never turned them on but today I go on Amazon and its now showing me adverts for the Airbed we briefly talked about in front of the TV -_-

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    CRTs did break. And they did suffer from burning.

    Just buy a non-smart modern TV, you won’t need a replacement and it won’t connect to the internet.

    • Logical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      Please tell me where I can get a modern high-res TV that is NOT smart. I have tried but cannot find them anywhere

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I recently bought a Thomson TV that’s HD and with no smart features at all. The only downside is that the image contrast is not the best.

          • Scrollone@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Enjoy! I’ve also bought their Google TV stick (same brand, I think it’s re-branded as ONN in the US though). It works well and I can just switch it in the future, without replacing the TV.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Your best bet would be a commercial display. Though it’ll be double the price, at least, and you’ll need an hdmi switch and a soundbar more like as not.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Just buy a tv, then don’t connect it to anything. But likely that you are going to connect something smart to it, so it doesn’t matter.

        • Logical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          It is possible to put it in a VLAN that is unable to talk to the internet. This is fine, but I wish I could just get a TV that doesn’t have this tracking functionality to begin with.

              • Nugscree@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I have a Nvidia shield pro currently running Plex and Jellyfin (sometimes Jellyfin cannot decode the videos and trans-coding is off), I am thinking about moving away from that and go custom Linux build on a mini PC. For live TV I have the app from my internet provider, although I rarely use it. Because the shield runs AndroidTV you can basically just install Prime, Disney, Netflix, etc. apps to run those. For YouTube I use a modified app that has ad and sponsor block build in, can’t remember which one it is, but there are enough to choose from. Everything is routed through a Pi-Hole with dns enforced on the router to use it, instead of external ones (in case an app gets smart and tries to use their own). Next to the Shield I also have an extensive DVD/Blue ray collection, most of which have been moved to the NAS that has the Jellyfin server. There are still enough things to do, but I don’t have the time to do all the things I want to do.

        • wooferTwo@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Have seen Samsungs hostility TVs, but only resource on them I could find was their own official store pages which are woefully void of any info I actually care about

          • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            We have a mix of commercial samsung and sharp TV’s for signboards. Both come with a proprietary signboard system but I use Pi5’s and google slides to manage them all. Every great now and then I have to reset something.

      • NoWay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        What’s a quality panel? You mean you can’t natively get clear resolution on your TV? Doesn’t sound very smart to me.

        • wooferTwo@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          You know there are more variables that contribute to the quality of the TV than the resolution? Like how bright it gets or how accurate it’s colors are and what it’s color space coverages are… Or how deep the blacks are or if the pixel response is decent. I guess people draw the line at different places and most probably don’t care at all… I do, but I also consider my privacy as a variable here. I am in a niche group of people that are completely underserved as I have looked and have not found… So if someone claims they know of some I ask them for their wisdom.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        You can a modern tv way way easier. I do it all the time. And you don’t risk electrocution or exposure, and it can be done in about 15 minutes for most issues.

    • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 days ago

      All of mine did but got increasingly quirkier over time. Sometimes you needed to hit it on top to get the picture looking right. Audio got crackly. The component cables needed a fine touch to display the picture correctly.

      That sort of fun stuff.

      • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Never having owned a CRT television (LCD was king when I became an adult) I have to say that that looks fucking sick. I don’t think I’ve ever wanted a bulky one until now.

        • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Retro games look better on them and there’s no emulator that has ever pulled off a sufficiently convincing simulation for me. They also render dark colors better than most high end TVs. If you play a lot of old games, it would be neat to have a small one. The big ones, however, weigh a metric ton and are at least as deep as they are wide, and they’re extremely front-heavy. Those aren’t worth it unless you plan to build an entire arcade cabinet around it.

          • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            True. This one is a 10" model and it already weighs a fuck-ton, and it’s quite deep and takes up a lot of space. But I really like how old games (especially PS1 and PS2) look on it.

            I wouldn’t go higher than 14" models because of the weight.

            • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Non-Sony models aren’t too heavy, especially 27" and below. My 27" CRT is more than managable for me to lift up by myself over my head.

              Sony included thick steel magnetic shielding around their tubes, making them significantly heavier compared to other brands.

    • pewpew@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      In the late 90s to early 2000s they made cheap plastic crap, the circuit board could break if you pushed the power button too hard

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    “your TV needs to install an update, please connect to the internet”, it says

    how did it know it needed an update?

    I am 60% sure I have seen this happen IRL

  • boydster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    I will forever remember using the magnet that came with this old Klutz book near the TV in my parents’ room when I was around 10 and noticing the rainbow pattern it made in the picture. And then, after further investigation and experimentation, noticing those colors stopped going away when I moved the magnet away. And then, never speaking a word of it. For, like, 40 years.

    When Bill Burr’s Netflix cartoon show put a similar bit in an episode it finally dawned on me that lots of kids must have messed up their parents’ TVs with those magnet wands.

  • tackleberry@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    First question I asked myself when I saw it was, “Why does my TV have an update?”

    I bought a TV to watch videos, not the other way around. Promptly disconnected that shit from the internet and it will stay that way.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      well sometimes it’s a firmware update and it actually improves the picture quality. Like with the recent LG G6 that had some issues during release