Some amazing engineer built a drone that can lift its own weight using only the electric power that it gets from an on-board solar panel and nothing else (no battery).

Video: I Built a Solar Powered Drone and it WORKS by Luke Maximo Bell

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Wasting the wing-effect on something like that and instead doing it as a quadcopter is seriously wasteful.

  • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just don’t bring it out on a windy day or the solar panel would turn into a sail real quick

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This boat can move with the power of wind alone, just using this big sheet! No motor or oars necessary! Just don’t bring it out on a windless day.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If they could add a flap and slight airfoil shape to the panel it could be an advantage in the wind.

      Also if it can propel itself up post the clouds it wouldn’t have to land for days.

      • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah a partially sail powered drone does sound really neat actually. Would definitely help extend the battery life

        • harmbugler@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Very interesting! If the drone can orient and bend itself into a wing/sail, there would be a lot it could do beyond just the motorised fans.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is excellent, now pair it with a lightish battery to fill in any gaps in sun exposure and add lora and this is the start of emergency deployment of meshtastic. Imagine just tossing one of these up and it can stay up all day.

    Oh and give it the ability to switch to glider mode so it can “land” without damage.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I am someone who is interested in rc planes, multirotors, and automation in general. Not an expert by any measure, but have some experience.

      A hybrid quad-rotor/plane would be much better for this. They can VTOL, hover, do all the quadcopter stuff, but there’s still the usual plane motors to push the whole thing forward. The wings provide tons of lift and reduce the overall power usage of the system. Have it circle above an area until you don’t need the pop-up mesh network.

      I’ve seen a few content creators like rctestflight make full solar planes, running ardupilot to fly way point missions and circle around for as long as possible.

      Combining the two might reduce the overall efficiency when compared to either separately, I imagine the extra grams from the mesh radios would still allow for very long flight times.

      So theoretically you should be able to toss a couple out that can circle overhead and act as super long line-of-sight relays and provide coverage over a huge area, all of which couod be deployed and packed up in minutes.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Uh no. This thing is really fragile and at the limit of what’s technologically feasible. It won’t survive in any real world application.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        yeah it’s really really fragile. they show it in the video, one of the panels broke because a cat stepped on it. obviously not very suited for real-world deployment.

        however i do wonder why they use polycrystalline silicon and not just amorphous silicon? I mean 20% efficiency instead of 8% makes a difference but i did some rough maths and it could still work with amorphous silicon if you use the area on the drone better. But amorphous silicon has the advantage of making a very thin and flexible layer that doesn’t break easily. It’s essentially more like a flexible piece of cloth instead of a solid object. Maybe worth a consideration.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I honestly fail to see how this is surprising? Why shouldn’t a drone be able to that? (Genuinely asking)

    • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because solar panels powerful enough to run a drone are large and heavy, and/or fragile. A solar panel sufficiently lightweight to be lifted by a low power drone, and simultaneously powerful enough to supply that drone, isn’t easy

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ah, so the tricky thing is to find the balance between weight of the drone and the weight of the solar panel and its capacity, yes? I thought it sounded like “wow, look what solar power can do”, as if the actual source of the energy made any difference :)

        • fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah the problem is more with the weight of the components and how little energy is in that small patch of sunlight. To provide enough thrust to hold it up is impressive, not just that a solar panel is providing power.

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            the thing is that the amount of power on that little patch of area is actually a lot; we just continue to underestimate it because it doesn’t feel like much. i mean, we stand under direct sunlight all day long and never feel like a train hits us. however, the amount of energy in the sunlight is quite a lot, we’re just very good at ignoring it.