• Cypher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I had the displeasure of being driven around in a new Kia this week.

    The driver couldn’t figure out how to control the AC fan speed. It seems to only be accessible via voice controls but it didn’t understand his accent.

    I’m never buying a car that lacks the appropriate buttons, switches and dials.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Screens are lighter and can be programmed and reprogrammed with the only cost being the developer time. Plop a screen in the middle of the dash. Done.

    Physical controls require wiring, lighting, design and durability for each control. Much of this is added weight, and the dash and console have to be designed to accommodate the controls.

    From a manufacturer perspective, screens are easier and more cost effective.

    IMO screens can get f’d. I much prefer physical controls for car functions.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Physical buttons are faster, more enjoyable to use and safer. But they won’t care as long as they don’t realise excessive touchscreen controls hurts their sales too.

    • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I remember car magazines in 2005 talking about how obviously stupid and unsafe touchscreens in cars are, as well as confidently predicting the trend would continue anyway because of, you guessed it: profit. Society really needs to figure out how to incentivize safety. Government must regulate capital for this to happen. There is (at present) no other way.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They also come with tactile feedback, you turn the knob and you know you turned it. No need to look or have beeps.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    2023 and many are still in 2026 heavily touch screen based and still have this hideous asthetic of what looks like a dashboard with an iPad glued to it. If you are going to go all in on the touchscreen at least make it look like it belongs to the car.

  • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No shit. Once I’m used to the layout, I can more easily hit the physical button I need without having to take my eyes off the road.

  • Tiral@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is why I bought a year old GTI and not a new one a few years ago. It was the last year with REAL gauges, REAL buttons, ect. I don’t want that shit on my car, especially a performance one.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That looks like it’s on the verge of having too many buttons on the wheel…? Could have had up/down switches for volume and increasing/decreasing cruise control for example, kinda like how the Mach E does it.

      But still a 1000x better than having it on the touchscreen, of course.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      heck I don’t even like switches that are still electronic controls over mechanical and neither does my wife. and I don’t even like cars to begin with.