House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said there is no need for an investigation into the ground stop issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Friday, instead highlighting the need for “investment.”

“We don’t really need any investigation … we need further investment,” Johnson said during an interview with Fox News’s Saturday in America. “I mean, some of this equipment dates back to the eighties so it’s gotta be updated and that’s our responsibility. We’re gonna work to get it done.”

The FAA issued the nationwide ground stop around 4 p.m. EST on Friday. The rare protocol was in place for over four hours. The agency’s last widespread stoppage, which lasted approximately 90 minutes, was in January 2023.

More than 4,500 flights within, into or out of the U.S. were delayed as of Saturday afternoon with over 5,000 canceled, according to flight tracking website FlightAware. Total reported delays on Saturday crossed 15,000.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Based on everything they’re saying insteadof calling for an investigation…they know exactly what went wrong. And it all boils down to an attempt to “upgrade an outdated system”, and “we need a lot more investment, before we’ll see results”.

    That’s AI, folks. They’re trying to find a way to integrate AI into the air-traffic control systems…and they fucked the whole thing up.

  • futileusername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Always the stooge trying to cover up for Trump’s blunders. They didn’t need an Untested AI add-on to fix air traffic control. They need to pay workers well enough so it’s a viable career for people to choose so they aren’t so understaffed. The infrastructure is old, but this outage was sloppy AI implementation.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What they really need to do is hire some government employees strictly to upgrade and maintain the air traffic network

      They claim a contractor, from a company linked to multiple air traffic events, was changing networking equipment from the old stuff to IP networking, and presumably they misconfigured a router and caused a packet storm

      Personally, I do think it was probably some slop AI configuration that is to blame, but even if their incident report is accurate… Why the hell are we letting a little contractor with a bunch of big problems touch our super important special network?

      In any sane world, we’d create a few teams to become experts on the system, and pay them well to take full responsibility for the network forever. It’s a very important legacy system, we need specialists on the payroll, not to hire the lowest cost bidder

    • October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Also we’re going to use this as a(nother) chance to enrich ourselves and our buddies at the expense of everyone else, so we’d appreciate it if you turned a blind eye to that

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Fuck you we DEFINITELY need an investigation as to why ALL flights in the United States were grounded

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If he knew what he was doing, he would have at least said, “yeah, we should investigate what happened” and then quietly forget about it. But he swerved the wrong way and now we know we need to look deeper.

    • thallamabond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We needed an investigation the minute they grounded the planes.

      This is the first clue that Club Members are involved.

  • the Howling North@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Between this and what’s-his-name demanding $50 billion I’m thinking some friends are looking to get paid before January.

  • 13igtyme@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I saw a theory this was a test to see how fast they could ground everything when they initiate martial law. Part of the reason international flights were still okay based on a “case by case” basis. Sure no communication, but let the jumbo jets fly.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m sure there were better ways to do it so it didn’t get so much negative publicity.

      Actually I know they could have.

      But this regime is so goddamn incompetent that I would bet they did intend for something like that to get tested, but didn’t intend for it to get out of control like it did.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not to dismiss the issue but only some frequencies were failing. Letting the flights already in the air while not letting anyone take off minimized the risk.

      The international flights that were allowed were from north and east airports going to Europe that go into Canada’s airspace very quickly and west coast going to Asia and Hawaii that basically fly with no air traffic control comms

      • 13igtyme@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Says you with no actual counter. Don’t put it past this administration. When a journalist asks 60+ air traffic controllers and they all say the transportation secretary is lying, you have to do better than, “Na uh, because I said so.”

              • 13igtyme@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago
                1. This is not an official forum for debate.
                2. You wouldn’t know official debate procedure if it was staring you in the face.
                3. Your “counter” argument, if you could even stretch the definition of the term, was “Doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny.” While providing zero actual counter points.

                I’ll give you a hint. 60 air traffic controllers said the transportation secretary is lying. The Trump administration has already teased not swearing in the new members of Congress. January 6th literally showed what the brown coats are capable of.

                Those are all things that stand as evidence of what is POSSIBLE but not necessarily the actual reason. This does even cover ALL the things this administration has done akin to a dictatorship and the possibility of martial law. I also will not be explaining it all in a 10,000 word essay to a random moron on the internet who’s counter argument could be succinctly summarized as “Na uh.”